Cited by 112Sports Performance and TrainingMuscle metabolism and nutritionExercise and Physiological Responses

Physiological elevation of endogenous hormones results in superior strength training adaptation

Open access
Rønnestad, Bent R., Nygaard, Håvard, Raastad, Truls·2011·European Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of transiently elevated endogenous hormone concentrations during exercise on strength training adaptations. Nine subjects performed four unilateral strength training session per week on the elbow flexors for 11 weeks. During two of the weekly sessions, leg exercises were performed to acutely increase the systemic anabolic hormone concentration immediately before the exercises for one of the elbow flexors (L + A). On the two other weekly training sessions, the contralateral elbow flexors were trained without prior leg exercises (A). By randomizing one arm of the subjects to serve as a control and the other as experimental, both conditions have the same nutritional and genetic environment. Serum testosterone and growth hormone was significantly increased during the L - A training session, while no hormonal changes occurred in the A session. Both A and L + A increased 1RM in biceps curl, peak power in elbow flexors at 30 and 60% of 1RM, and muscle volume of the elbow flexors (p < 0.05). However, only L + A achieved increase in CSA at the part of the arm flexors with largest cross sectional area (p < 0.001), while no changes occurred in A. L + A had superior relative improvement in 1RM biceps curl and favorable muscle adaptations in elbow flexors compared to A (p < 0.05). In conclusion, performing leg exercises prior to arm exercises, and thereby increasing the levels of serum testosterone and growth hormone, induced superior strength training adaptations compared to arm training without acute elevation of hormones.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00421-011-1860-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 77 · Cited by 112

Authors
Rønnestad, B. R., Nygaard, H., & Raastad, T.
Affiliations
  • Lillehammer University College (NO)
  • Norwegian School of Sport Sciences (NO)
Corresponding author
Rønnestad, Bent R.
Venue
European Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
2011-02-16
Volume
111
Issue
9
Pages
2249-2259
ISSN
  • 0020-9376 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-6319
  • 1439-6327
OpenAlex
W1980779051
Cited by
112
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 6
FWCI
11.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)) (submittedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
Keywords
strength training adaptation, endogenous hormones, testosterone, growth hormone, leg exercise, elbow flexors, biceps curl, muscle cross-sectional area, muscle volume, peak power, 1RM strength
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Adult, Arm, Elbow, Hormones, Humans, Male, Physical Education and Training, Weight Lifting, Exercise, Up-Regulation, Muscle, Skeletal, Human Growth Hormone, Muscle Strength, Resistance Training, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review