Impact of hepatic vein deprivation on liver regeneration and function after major hepatectomy
Abstract
Background and aims In extended liver resections, the preservation of vascular and biliary structures of the entire remnant liver is of paramount importance. The impact of venous outflow impairment and its consequences for liver regeneration and function are still a matter of debate. Materials and methods Rats (n = 75) were subjected to a 90% partial hepatectomy (PH), to a 70% liver resection with narrowing of the hepatic outflow of an additional 20% parenchyma (70%+ PH) or to an anatomic 70% PH. Postoperatively hepatocyte proliferation (Ki-67), liver function and survival were assessed. Gene expression analysis for markers of regeneration was determined by in-house complementary (DNA) arrays and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Results Ninety percent PH led to a greater regenerative response as shown Ki-67 compared to animals with a 70%+PH (p Conclusion Venous outflow obstruction leads to an impairment of liver regeneration and liver function. In cases with critically small liver remnants, restoration of an adequate venous outflow may be mandatory.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Liver venous deprivation (LVD) induces faster future liver remnant growth and enables earlier liver resection compared to portal vein embolization (PVE) alone.
“Studies have demonstrated that LVD induces faster FLR growth and enables earlier liver resection compared to PVE alone[29-31].”
From Liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy: Triggers and mechanisms (2025) · cites this paper as [31]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy: Triggers and mechanisms
Korchilava, B., Khachidze, T., Megrelishvili, N., Svanadze, L., Kakabadze, M., Tsomaia, K., Jintcharadze, M., & Kordzaia, D. (2025) · World Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.4254/wjh.v17.i7.107378 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bockhorn, M., Benkö, T., Opitz, B., Sheu, S.-Y., Sotiropoulos, G. C., Schlaak, J. F., Broelsch, C. E., & Lang, H.
- Affiliations
- Essen University Hospital (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Bockhorn, Maximilian
- Venue
- Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
- Published
- 2007-09-12
- Volume
- 393
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 527-533
- ISSN
- 0023-8236 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-2443
- 1435-2451
- OpenAlex
- W2020499267
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Universitätsklinikum Essen
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
- Keywords
- hepatic vein obstruction, liver regeneration, partial hepatectomy, extended liver resection, remnant liver, hepatocyte proliferation, Ki-67, liver function, postoperative survival
- MeSH terms
- Receptor, Transforming Growth Factor-beta Type I, Animals, Body Weight, Hepatectomy, Hepatic Veins, Liver, Liver Function Tests, Liver Regeneration, Male, Gene Expression, Survival Analysis, Rats, Wistar, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases, Receptors, Transforming Growth Factor beta, Ki-67 Antigen, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-sis, Hepatocytes, Rats, Interleukin-1 Receptor-Associated Kinases
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review