Cited by 22Hernia repair and managementSurgical Sutures and AdhesivesMinimally Invasive Surgical Techniques

Comparison of a lightweight polypropylene mesh (Optilene® LP) and a large-pore knitted PTFE mesh (GORE® INFINIT® mesh)—Biocompatibility in a standardized endoscopic extraperitoneal hernia model

Jacob, Dietmar A., Schug-Paß, Christine, Sommerer, Florian, Tannapfel, Andrea, Lippert, Hans, Köckerling, Ferdinand·2012·Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery

Abstract

Purpose The use of a mesh with good biocompatibility properties is of decisive importance for the avoidance of recurrences and chronic pain in endoscopic hernia repair surgery. As we know from numerous experiments and clinical experience, large-pore, lightweight polypropylene meshes possess the best biocompatibility. However, large-pore meshes of different polymers may be used as well and might be an alternative solution. Methods Utilizing a totally extraperitoneal technique in an established animal model, 20 domestic pigs were implanted with either a lightweight large-pore polypropylene (PP) mesh (Optilene® LP) or a medium-weight large-pore knitted polytetrafluorethylene (PTFE) mesh (GORE® INFINIT® mesh). After 94 days, the pigs were sacrificed and postmortem diagnostic laparoscopy was performed, followed by explantation of the specimens for macroscopic, histological and immunohistochemical evaluation. Results The mean mesh shrinkage rate was 14.2% for Optilene® LP vs. 24.7% for INFINIT® mesh (p = 0.017). The partial volume of the inflammatory cells was 11.2% for Optilene® LP vs. 13.9% for INFINIT (n.s.). CD68 was significantly higher for INFINIT (11.8% vs. 5.6%, p = 0.007). The markers of cell turnover, namely Ki67 and the apoptotic index, were comparable at 6.4% vs. 12.4% (n.s.) and 1.6% vs. 2.0% (n.s.). In the extracellular matrix, TGF-β was 35.4% for Optilene® LP and 31.0% for INFINIT® (n.s.). Collagen I (pos/300 μm) deposits were 117.8 and 114.9, respectively. Conclusio…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00423-011-0858-8

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lightweight and large-pore PP meshes have been developed to reduce the amount of implanted material, thus lowering the inflammatory response and improving patient outcomes.

    “To address these issues, lightweight and large-pore PP meshes have been developed to reduce the overall amount of implanted material, thus lowering the inflammatory response and improving patient outcomes [247].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jacob, D. A., Schug-Paß, C., Sommerer, F., Tannapfel, A., Lippert, H., & Köckerling, F.
Affiliations
  • Vivantes Klinikum (DE)
  • Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
  • Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Jacob, Dietmar A.
Venue
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
Published
2011-10-12
Volume
397
Issue
2
Pages
283-289
ISSN
  • 0023-8236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-2443
  • 1435-2451
OpenAlex
W2032081917
Cited by
22
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hernia repair and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Sutures and Adhesives
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
Keywords
biocompatibility, endoscopic hernia repair, totally extraperitoneal repair, polypropylene mesh, PTFE mesh, mesh shrinkage, chronic inflammation, CD68, TGF-beta, collagen deposition, extracellular matrix, porcine model, abdominal wall hernia, recurrence prevention, immunohistochemistry
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Animals, Biocompatible Materials, Biopsy, Needle, Disease Models, Animal, Hernia, Inguinal, Immunohistochemistry, Materials Testing, Laparoscopy, Polypropylenes, Polytetrafluoroethylene, Random Allocation, Sensitivity and Specificity, Surgical Mesh, Swine, Wound Healing, Risk Assessment, Sus scrofa, Abdominal Wall, Herniorrhaphy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review