Cited by 118Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase SignalingSphingolipid Metabolism and SignalingLipid metabolism and biosynthesis

Local PIP2 signals: when, where, and how?

Hilgemann, Donald W.·2007·Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology

Abstract

PIP(2) is a minor phospholipid that modulates multiple cellular processes. However, its abundance by mass, like diacylglycerol, is still 20 to 100 times greater than the master phospholipid second messenger, PIP(3). Therefore, it is a case-by-case question whether PIP(2) is acting more like GTP, in being a cofactor in regulatory processes, or whether it is being used as a true second messenger. Analysis of signaling mechanisms in primary cells is essential to answer this question, as overexpression studies will naturally generate false positives. In connection with the possible messenger function of PIP(2), a second question arises as to how and if PIP(2) metabolism and signaling may be limited in space. This review summarizes succinctly the notable cases in which PIP(2) is proposed to function in a localized way and the different mechanistic models that may allow it to function locally. In general, drastic restrictions of PIP(2) diffusion are required. It is speculated that molecular PIP(2) signaling may be possible in the absence of PIP(2) gradients via ternary complexes between PIP(2) and two protein partners. That PIP(2) synthesis and hydrolysis might be locally dependent on protein-protein interactions, and direct lipid "hand-off" is suggested by multiple results.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00424-007-0280-9

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Local enrichment of PI(4,5)P2 can occur by preferential trapping in lipid rafts, binding proteins such as MARCKS, syntaxin-1 and K-Ras, or localised recruitment of PIP5K.

    “Local enrichment of PI(4,5)P2 can occur by multiple mechanisms [131,132]. There can be preferential trapping of PI(4,5)P2 in lipid rafts, binding proteins such as MARCKS (myristoylated alanine-rich C-kinase substrate), syntaxin-1 and K-Ras that sequester PI(4,5)P2, or localised recruitment of PIP5K to generate PI(4,5)P2.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hilgemann, D. W.
Affiliations
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Hilgemann, Donald W.
Venue
Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology
Published
2007-05-30
Volume
455
Issue
1
Pages
55-67
ISSN
  • 0031-6768 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2013
OpenAlex
W1993642322
Cited by
118
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 9
FWCI
0.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NIH-HL5132312, NIH-HL067942)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sphingolipid Metabolism and Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Lipid metabolism and biosynthesis
Keywords
phosphatidylinositol 2, second messengers, ternary protein complex, protein-protein interaction, primary cells
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Second Messenger Systems, Signal Transduction, Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-Diphosphate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review