Root regulation of artemisinin production in Artemisia annua: trichome and metabolite evidence
Abstract
Main conclusion Roots of plants with high artemisinin-producing leaves increased leaf production of artemisinin in low-producing plants and vice versa indicating roots are involved in controlling artemisinin biosynthesis in shoots. The anti-malarial sesquiterpene, artemisinin, is produced and stored in glandular trichomes (GLTs) of Artemisia annua. Evidence suggested roots, which produce no significant artemisinin nor precursor compounds, regulate production of artemisinin biosynthesis in the leaves. Using grafting, we studied the relationship between rootstock and scion by measuring GLTs and five artemisinic metabolites (artemisinin, deoxyartemisinin, dihydroartemisinic acid, artemisinic acid, arteannuin B) in scions of ungrafted, self-grafted, and cross-grafted plants among three cultivars: S and 15 both having GLTs with artemisinin at 1.49 and 0.57 %, respectively, and G producing neither GLTs nor detectable artemisinin. All artemisinin-producing self-grafts, e.g., S/S (scion/rootstock) and 15/15, produced more artemisinin than ungrafted plants, likely from grafting stress. S/S grafts also produced more GLTs. The 15/S grafts produced more artemisinin than S/15, suggesting rootstocks from high producing S plants stimulated artemisinin production in 15 scions. S/15 grafts yielded less artemisinin than S/S, but more than either 15/15 or ungrafted n15 and nS; S/15 grafts also had a lower density of GLTs than S/S, suggesting rootstock inhibition of the scion. The S rootstock induced trace artemisinin production in G scions, but did not induce GLT formation in G/S grafts. Different grafts exhibited different trichome morphologies and effects on artemisinic pathway flux. This study provides new information regarding the role of roots in GLT development and artemisinin production in this important medicinal plant.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
GLS has a plethora of T-trichomes and those were posited as the site of the artemisinin produced in the GLS shoots.
“GLS does have, however, a plethora of the T-trichomes and those were posited as the site of the artemisinin produced in the GLS shoots.”
From Enhancing artemisinin content in and delivery from Artemisia annua: a review of alternative, classical, and transgenic approaches (2021) · cites this paper as Wang et al. 2016
The GLS shoots did not produce any detectable glandular trichomes.
“Interestingly, the GLS shoots did not produce any detectable glandular trichomes.”
From Enhancing artemisinin content in and delivery from Artemisia annua: a review of alternative, classical, and transgenic approaches (2021) · cites this paper as Wang et al. 2016
Using an A. annua mutant (glandless, GLS) that produces no glandular trichomes and no detectable artemisinin, non-glandular T-trichomes found in this species also produced detectable artemisinin.
“More recently, using an A. annua mutant (glandless, GLS) that produces no glandular trichomes and no detectable artemisinin (Duke et al. 1994), non-glandular T-trichomes found in this species also produced detectable artemisinin (Wang et al. 2016; Judd et al. 2019) as further detailed in Sect. 2.6.”
From Enhancing artemisinin content in and delivery from Artemisia annua: a review of alternative, classical, and transgenic approaches (2021) · cites this paper as Wang et al. 2016
Grafting GLS shoots onto high producing (~1.5% w/w artemisinin) A. annua cv. SAM roots resulted in GLS shoots producing detectable amounts (0.17 mg/g FW) of artemisinin.
“They grafted GLS shoots onto high producing (~ 1.5% w/w artemisinin) A. annua cv. SAM roots and GLS shoots subsequently produced detectable amounts (0.17 mg/g FW) of artemisinin.”
From Enhancing artemisinin content in and delivery from Artemisia annua: a review of alternative, classical, and transgenic approaches (2021) · cites this paper as Wang et al. 2016
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 55 · Cited by 9
- Authors
- Wang, S., Towler, M. J., & Weathers, P. J.
- Affiliations
- Worcester Polytechnic Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Weathers, Pamela J.
- Venue
- Planta
- Published
- 2016-06-23
- Volume
- 244
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 999-1010
- ISSN
- 0032-0935 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-2048
- OpenAlex
- W2464946589
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 0.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Planta (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant tissue culture and regeneration
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies
- Keywords
- artemisinin biosynthesis, Artemisia annua, rootstock-scion interaction, grafting, glandular trichomes, dihydroartemisinic acid, arteannuin B, medicinal plant secondary metabolism
- MeSH terms
- Flavonoids, Phenotype, Plant Leaves, Plant Roots, Biomass, Artemisia annua, Artemisinins, Biosynthetic Pathways, Metabolome, Trichomes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review