Cited by 388Cognitive Abilities and TestingDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyCognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills

Working memory and executive functions: effects of training on academic achievement

Titz, Cora, Karbach, Julia·2014·Psychological Research

Abstract

The aim of this review is to illustrate the role of working memory and executive functions for scholastic achievement as an introduction to the question of whether and how working memory and executive control training may improve academic abilities. The review of current research showed limited but converging evidence for positive effects of process-based complex working-memory training on academic abilities, particularly in the domain of reading. These benefits occurred in children suffering from cognitive and academic deficits as well as in healthy students. Transfer of training to mathematical abilities seemed to be very limited and to depend on the training regime and the characteristics of the study sample. A core issue in training research is whether high- or low-achieving children benefit more from cognitive training. Individual differences in terms of training-related benefits suggested that process-based working memory and executive control training often induced compensation effects with larger benefits in low performing individuals. Finally, we discuss the effects of process-based training in relation to other types of interventions aimed at improving academic achievement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00426-013-0537-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 168 · Cited by 388

Authors
Titz, C., & Karbach, J.
Affiliations
  • DIPF | Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education (DE)
  • Saarland University (DE)
Corresponding author
Titz, Cora
Venue
Psychological Research
Published
2014-01-04
Volume
78
Issue
6
Pages
852-868
ISSN
  • 0033-3026 (ISSN-L)
  • 0340-0727
  • 1430-2772
OpenAlex
W2037994470
Cited by
388
References
168
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 12
FWCI
3.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
Keywords
working memory, executive function, cognitive training, academic performance, reading skills, mathematical ability, transfer of training, compensation effect, individual differences, children with learning disabilities
MeSH terms
Achievement, Adult, Attention, Child, Cognition, Educational Status, Humans, Memory, Short-Term, Practice, Psychological, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review