Working memory and executive functions: effects of training on academic achievement
Abstract
The aim of this review is to illustrate the role of working memory and executive functions for scholastic achievement as an introduction to the question of whether and how working memory and executive control training may improve academic abilities. The review of current research showed limited but converging evidence for positive effects of process-based complex working-memory training on academic abilities, particularly in the domain of reading. These benefits occurred in children suffering from cognitive and academic deficits as well as in healthy students. Transfer of training to mathematical abilities seemed to be very limited and to depend on the training regime and the characteristics of the study sample. A core issue in training research is whether high- or low-achieving children benefit more from cognitive training. Individual differences in terms of training-related benefits suggested that process-based working memory and executive control training often induced compensation effects with larger benefits in low performing individuals. Finally, we discuss the effects of process-based training in relation to other types of interventions aimed at improving academic achievement.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Impairments in EF are related to associated problems such as deficient academic functioning.
“and with associated problems such as deficient academic functioning [12], [13]”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 168 · Cited by 388
- Authors
- Titz, C., & Karbach, J.
- Affiliations
- DIPF | Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education (DE)
- Saarland University (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Titz, Cora
- ORCID
- Karbach, Julia
- Venue
- Psychological Research
- Published
- 2014-01-04
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 852-868
- ISSN
- 0033-3026 (ISSN-L)
- 0340-0727
- 1430-2772
- OpenAlex
- W2037994470
- Cited by
- 388
- References
- 168
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 12
- FWCI
- 3.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Psychological Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
- Keywords
- working memory, executive function, cognitive training, academic performance, reading skills, mathematical ability, transfer of training, compensation effect, individual differences, children with learning disabilities
- MeSH terms
- Achievement, Adult, Attention, Child, Cognition, Educational Status, Humans, Memory, Short-Term, Practice, Psychological, Executive Function
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review