Cited by 45Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural Mechanisms

The comparative distributions of the monoamine transporters in the rodent, monkey, and human amygdala

Open access
Smith, Hilary R., Porrino, Linda J.·2008·Brain Structure and Function

Abstract

The monoamines in the amygdala modulate multiple aspects of emotional processing in the mammalian brain, and organic or pharmacological dysregulation of these systems can result in affective pathologies. Knowledge of the normal distribution of these neurotransmitters, therefore, is central to our understanding of both the normal processes regulated by the amygdala and the pathological conditions associated with monoaminergic dysregulation. The monoaminergic transporters have proven to be accurate and reliable markers of the distributions of their substrates. The purpose of this review was twofold: First, to briefly recount the functional relevance of dopamine, serotonin, and norepinephrine transmission in the amygdala, and second, to describe and compare the distributions of the monoamine transporters in the rodent, monkey, and human brain. The transporters were found to be heterogeneously distributed in the amygdala. The dopamine transporter (DAT) is consistently found to be extremely sparsely distributed, however the various accounts of its subregional topography are inconsistent, making any cross-species comparisons difficult. The serotonin transporter (SERT) had the greatest overall degree of labeling of the three markers, and was characterized by substantial inter-species variability in its relative distribution. The norepinephrine transporter (NET) was shown to possess an intermediate level of labeling, and like the SERT, its distribution is not consistent across the th…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00429-008-0176-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 223 · Cited by 45

Authors
Smith, H. R., & Porrino, L. J.
Affiliations
Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
Corresponding author
Smith, Hilary R.
Venue
Brain Structure and Function
Published
2008-02-19
Volume
213
Issue
1-2
Pages
73-91
ISSN
  • 1863-2653 (ISSN-L)
  • 1863-2661
OpenAlex
W2055208968
Cited by
45
References
223
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain Structure and Function (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA020648, R01DA009085, DA09085, P50DA006634, DA020648, DA 06634)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
amygdala, monoamine transporters, dopamine transporter, serotonin transporter, norepinephrine transporter, species differences, cross-species comparison, rodents, monkeys, human, emotional processing, neurotransmitter distribution
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Animals, Haplorhini, Humans, Neurons, Rodentia, Serotonin, Species Specificity, Biogenic Monoamines, Plasma Membrane Neurotransmitter Transport Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review