Cited by 206Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyStress Responses and Cortisol

Noradrenergic transmission in the extended amygdala: role in increased drug-seeking and relapse during protracted drug abstinence

Open access
Smith, Rachel J., Aston-Jones, Gary·2008·Brain Structure and Function

Abstract

Studies reviewed here implicate the extended amygdala in the negative affective states and increased drug-seeking that occur during protracted abstinence from chronic drug exposure. Norepinephrine (NE) and corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) signaling in the extended amygdala, including the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, shell of the nucleus accumbens, and central nucleus of the amygdala, are generally involved in behavioral responses to environmental and internal stressors. Hyperactivity of stress response systems during addiction drives many negative components of drug abstinence. In particular, NE signaling from the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS) to the extended amygdala, along with increased CRF transmission within the extended amygdala, are critical for the aversiveness of acute opiate withdrawal as well as stress-induced relapse of drug-seeking for opiates, cocaine, ethanol, and nicotine. NE and CRF transmission in the extended amygdala are also implicated in the increased anxiety that occurs during prolonged abstinence from chronic opiates, cocaine, ethanol, and cannabinoids. Many of these stress-associated behaviors are reversed by NE or CRF antagonists given systemically or locally within the extended amygdala. Finally, increased Fos activation in the extended amygdala and NTS is associated with the enhanced preference for drugs and decreased preference for natural rewards observed during protracted abstinence from opiates and cocaine, indicating that these areas are involved in the altered reward processing associated with addiction. Together, these findings suggest that involvement of the extended amygdala and its noradrenergic afferents in anxiety, stress-induced relapse, and altered reward processing reflects a common function for these circuits in stress modulation of drug-seeking.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00429-008-0191-3

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The BNST, CeA, and NAc-Sh form the extended amygdala, an anatomically and neurochemically interconnected system in the basal forebrain.

    “The bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST), central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA), and shell of the nucleus accumbens (NAc-Sh) form the extended amygdala, an anatomically and neurochemically interconnected system located in the basal forebrain (Smith and Aston-Jones 2008).”

    From Nicotine Withdrawal (2015) · cites this paper as Smith and Aston-Jones 2008

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 217 · Cited by 206

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Bremner JD Krystal JH Southwick SM Charney DS 1996b Noradrenergic mechanisms in stress and anxiety: II. Clinical studies Synapse 23 39 51 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2396 (199605)23:1<39::AID-SYN5>3.0.CO;2-I 8723134 · DOI

Authors
Smith, R. J., & Aston-Jones, G.
Affiliations
Medical University of South Carolina (US)
Venue
Brain Structure and Function
Published
2008-07-24
Volume
213
Issue
1-2
Pages
43-61
ISSN
  • 1863-2653 (ISSN-L)
  • 1863-2661
OpenAlex
W1971457924
Cited by
206
References
217
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 19
FWCI
1.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain Structure and Function (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R37DA006214, R01DA017289)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
extended amygdala, noradrenergic neurotransmission, norepinephrine, corticotropin-releasing factor, drug-seeking behavior, relapse, stress response, nucleus tractus solitarius, bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, central amygdala, nucleus accumbens shell, opioid withdrawal, cocaine, ethanol, nicotine, anxiety, Fos activation, negative affect
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Animals, Anxiety, Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone, Humans, Norepinephrine, Recurrence, Stress, Psychological, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Behavior, Addictive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review