Cited by 183Face Recognition and PerceptionEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

ALE meta-analysis on facial judgments of trustworthiness and attractiveness

Open access
Bzdok, D., Langner, R., Caspers, S., Kurth, F., Habel, U., Zilles, K., Laird, A., Eickhoff, Simon B.·2011·Brain Structure and Function

Abstract

Faces convey a multitude of information in social interaction, among which are trustworthiness and attractiveness. Humans process and evaluate these two dimensions very quickly due to their great adaptive importance. Trustworthiness evaluation is crucial for modulating behavior toward strangers; attractiveness evaluation is a crucial factor for mate selection, possibly providing cues for reproductive success. As both dimensions rapidly guide social behavior, this study tests the hypothesis that both judgments may be subserved by overlapping brain networks. To this end, we conducted an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis on 16 functional magnetic resonance imaging studies pertaining to facial judgments of trustworthiness and attractiveness. Throughout combined, individual, and conjunction analyses on those two facial judgments, we observed consistent maxima in the amygdala which corroborates our initial hypothesis. This finding supports the contemporary paradigm shift extending the amygdala's role from dominantly processing negative emotional stimuli to processing socially relevant ones. We speculate that the amygdala filters sensory information with evolutionarily conserved relevance. Our data suggest that such a role includes not only "fight-or-flight" decisions but also social behaviors with longer term pay-off schedules, e.g., trustworthiness and attractiveness evaluation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00429-010-0287-4

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 137 · Cited by 183

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Cosmides L Tooby J Gazzaniga MS The cognitive neuroscience of social reasoning The new cognitive neuroscience 2000 Cambridge MIT Press 1259 1276
  2. Eickhoff SB Stephan KE Mohlberg H Grefkes C Fink GR Amunts K Zilles K A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data Neuroimage 2005b 25 4 1325 1335 15850749
  3. Wrangham R Peterson D Demonic males: apes and the origin of human violence 1996 London Bloomsbury

Authors
Bzdok, D., Langner, R., Caspers, S., Kurth, F., Habel, U., Zilles, K., Laird, A., & Eickhoff, S. B.
Affiliations
  • RWTH Aachen University (DE)
  • Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Jülich Aachen Research Alliance (DE)
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
Corresponding author
Eickhoff, Simon B.
Venue
Brain Structure and Function
Published
2010-10-27
Volume
215
Issue
3-4
Pages
209-223
ISSN
  • 1863-2653 (ISSN-L)
  • 1863-2661
OpenAlex
W2043226723
Cited by
183
References
137
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain Structure and Function (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • JuSER (Forschungszentrum Jülich) (submittedVersion)
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH074457)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
amygdala, social perception, face processing, mate choice
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Beauty, Emotions, Face, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Social Perception, Likelihood Functions, Recognition, Psychology, Trust

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review