ALE meta-analysis on facial judgments of trustworthiness and attractiveness
Open accessAbstract
Faces convey a multitude of information in social interaction, among which are trustworthiness and attractiveness. Humans process and evaluate these two dimensions very quickly due to their great adaptive importance. Trustworthiness evaluation is crucial for modulating behavior toward strangers; attractiveness evaluation is a crucial factor for mate selection, possibly providing cues for reproductive success. As both dimensions rapidly guide social behavior, this study tests the hypothesis that both judgments may be subserved by overlapping brain networks. To this end, we conducted an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis on 16 functional magnetic resonance imaging studies pertaining to facial judgments of trustworthiness and attractiveness. Throughout combined, individual, and conjunction analyses on those two facial judgments, we observed consistent maxima in the amygdala which corroborates our initial hypothesis. This finding supports the contemporary paradigm shift extending the amygdala's role from dominantly processing negative emotional stimuli to processing socially relevant ones. We speculate that the amygdala filters sensory information with evolutionarily conserved relevance. Our data suggest that such a role includes not only "fight-or-flight" decisions but also social behaviors with longer term pay-off schedules, e.g., trustworthiness and attractiveness evaluation.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The AM is thought to automatically extract biological significance from the environment.
“This brain region is thought to automatically extract biological significance from the environment (Ball et al. 2007; Sander et al. 2003; Bzdok et al. 2011; Müller et al. 2011).”
From Parsing the neural correlates of moral cognition: ALE meta-analysis on morality, theory of mind, and empathy (2012) · cites this paper as Bzdok et al. 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 137 · Cited by 183
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Cosmides L Tooby J Gazzaniga MS The cognitive neuroscience of social reasoning The new cognitive neuroscience 2000 Cambridge MIT Press 1259 1276
- Eickhoff SB Stephan KE Mohlberg H Grefkes C Fink GR Amunts K Zilles K A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data Neuroimage 2005b 25 4 1325 1335 15850749
- Wrangham R Peterson D Demonic males: apes and the origin of human violence 1996 London Bloomsbury
- Authors
- Bzdok, D., Langner, R., Caspers, S., Kurth, F., Habel, U., Zilles, K., Laird, A., & Eickhoff, S. B.
- Affiliations
- RWTH Aachen University (DE)
- Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Jülich Aachen Research Alliance (DE)
- The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Eickhoff, Simon B.
- Venue
- Brain Structure and Function
- Published
- 2010-10-27
- Volume
- 215
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 209-223
- ISSN
- 1863-2653 (ISSN-L)
- 1863-2661
- PMC
- PMC4020344
- OpenAlex
- W2043226723
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 137
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 5.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Brain Structure and Function (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- JuSER (Forschungszentrum Jülich) (submittedVersion)
- RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH074457)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- amygdala, social perception, face processing, mate choice
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Beauty, Emotions, Face, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Social Perception, Likelihood Functions, Recognition, Psychology, Trust
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review