Cited by 57Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Abnormal processing of deontological guilt in obsessive–compulsive disorder

Basile, Barbara, Mancini, Francesco, Macaluso, Emiliano, Caltagirone, Carlo, Bozzali, Marco·2014·Brain Structure and Function

Abstract

Guilt plays a significant role in the occurrence and maintenance of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Two major types of guilt have been identified: one deriving from the transgression of a moral rule (deontological guilt DG), another (altruistic guilt AG), relying on the assumption of having compromised a personal altruistic goal. Clinical evidence suggests that OCD patients are particularly sensitive to DG, but not AG. In this functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study, we investigated brain response of OCD patients while processing DG and AG stimuli. A previously validated fMRI paradigm was used to selectively evoke DG and AG, and anger and sadness, as control emotions in 13 OCD patients and 19 healthy controls. Patients' behavioral results showed a prominent attitude to experience guilt, compared to controls, while accomplishing task. fMRI results revealed that patients have reduced activation in the anterior cingulate (ACC) and frontal gyrus when experiencing guilt, regardless of its specific type (DG or AG). When separately considering each type of guilt (against each of its control), patients showed decreased activation in the ACC, the insula and the precuneus, for DG. No significant differences were observed between groups when processing AG, anger or sad stimuli. This study provides evidence for an abnormal processing of guilt, and specifically DG, in OCD patients. We suggest that decreased activation may reflect patients' cerebral efficiency, which derive…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00429-013-0570-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Obsessions signal to the patient the risk of violating (or having violated) a subjectively mandatory ethical principle.

    “From this perspective, obsessions signal to the patient the risk of violating (or having violated) a subjectively mandatory ethical principle and compulsions are activities aimed at preventing or at least reducing this risk and the guilt that would derive from it (Basile et al., 2014; D'Olimpio & Mancini, 2014; Mancini & Barcaccia, 2014; Mancini & Gangemi, 2004, 2015, 2017; Ottaviani et al., 2019”
  • Compulsions are activities aimed at preventing or at least reducing the risk of violating a subjectively mandatory ethical principle and the guilt that would derive from it.

    “From this perspective, obsessions signal to the patient the risk of violating (or having violated) a subjectively mandatory ethical principle and compulsions are activities aimed at preventing or at least reducing this risk and the guilt that would derive from it (Basile et al., 2014; D'Olimpio & Mancini, 2014; Mancini & Barcaccia, 2014; Mancini & Gangemi, 2004, 2015, 2017; Ottaviani et al., 2019”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 46 · Cited by 57

Authors
Basile, B., Mancini, F., Macaluso, E., Caltagirone, C., & Bozzali, M.
Affiliations
  • Fondazione Santa Lucia (IT)
  • University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT)
Corresponding author
Bozzali, Marco
Venue
Brain Structure and Function
Published
2013-05-17
Volume
219
Issue
4
Pages
1321-1331
ISSN
  • 1863-2653 (ISSN-L)
  • 1863-2661
OpenAlex
W2052344705
Cited by
57
References
46
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5
FWCI
4.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Structure and Function (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministero della Salute
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
obsessive-compulsive disorder, anterior cingulate cortex, insula, precuneus, neural efficiency hypothesis, moral transgression
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Emotions, Female, Guilt, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Morals, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Psychometrics, Functional Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review