Cited by 122Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Salience network connectivity in the insula is associated with individual differences in interoceptive accuracy.

Chong, Joanna Su Xian, Ng, Gavin Jun Peng, Lee, Sze Chi, Zhou, Juan·2017·Brain Structure and Function

Abstract

The insula and the anterior cingulate cortex are core brain regions that anchor the salience network, one of several large-scale intrinsic functional connectivity networks that have been derived consistently using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). While several studies have shown that the insula and anterior cingulate cortex play important roles in interoceptive awareness, no study to date has examined the association between intrinsic salience network connectivity and interoceptive awareness. In this study, we sought to test this idea in 26 healthy young participants who underwent a resting-state fMRI scan and a heartbeat counting task outside the scanner in the same session. Greater salience network connectivity in the posterior insula (but not the anterior cingulate cortex) using independent component analysis correlated with higher accuracy in the heartbeat counting task. Furthermore, using seed-based approach, greater interoceptive accuracy was associated with greater intrinsic connectivity of all insular functional subdivisions to salience network regions, including the anterior insula, orbitofrontal cortex, ventral striatum and midbrain. These associations remained after correcting for voxel-wise grey matter volumes. The findings underscore the critical role of insular salience network intrinsic connectivity in interoceptive awareness and pave the way for future investigations into how salience network dysconnectivity affects interoceptive awareness in brain disorders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00429-016-1297-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 57 · Cited by 122

Authors
Chong, J. S. X., Ng, G. J. P., Lee, S. C., & Zhou, J.
Affiliations
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • Agency for Science, Technology and Research (SG)
Corresponding author
Zhou, Juan
Venue
Brain Structure and Function
Published
2016-08-29
Volume
222
Issue
4
Pages
1635-1644
ISSN
  • 1863-2653 (ISSN-L)
  • 1863-2661
OpenAlex
W2516986034
Cited by
122
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5
FWCI
2.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Structure and Function (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Agency for Science, Technology and Research (13/1/96/19/687)
  • National Medical Research Council (CBRG/0088/2015)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
salience network, insula, anterior cingulate cortex, interoceptive accuracy, interoceptive awareness, intrinsic functional connectivity, resting-state functional connectivity, heartbeat counting task, individual differences, anterior insula, orbitofrontal cortex, ventral striatum, midbrain, gray matter volume
MeSH terms
Adult, Awareness, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Individuality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Young Adult, Interoception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review