Hand, foot and mouth disease: seroprevalence of Coxsackie A16 and Enterovirus 71 in Germany
Abstract
Coxsackie A16 (CA16) and Enterovirus 71 (EV71) are members of the picornaviridae family and are associated with hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD), in rare cases also to acute neurological diseases. HFMD outbreaks have been reported from many parts of the world, especially Southeast Asia. The objective of the study was to analyze CA16 and EV71 seroepidemiologically in the population of Frankfurt/M., Germany. A total of 696 individuals (349 males and 347 females, divided into seven different age groups, 1-4, 5-9, 10-14, 15-19, 20-39, 40-59 and >60 years) were tested for serum antibodies against CA16 and EV71 by the use of a microneutralization test. Sera were collected at the Frankfurt university hospital from patients suffering from other diseases between March and September 2006. CA16 and EV71 infections were observed to be widely present in the population. The age-adjusted seroprevalence for individuals >or=1 year was found to be 62.9% for CA16 and 42.8% for EV71 without a gender-specific significant difference. Only 12.0 and 27.0% of the children aged 1-4 had antibodies to EV71 and CA16, respectively - indicating that 88 and 73% of the children in this age group were susceptible to the infection. A total of 213 individuals (30.6%) was seropositive for both viruses, 303 (43.5%) showed neutralizing antibodies (NtAb) to at least one of the two viruses. A total of 180 individuals (25.9%) revealed no antibodies. High CA16 and EV71 antibody titers were found especially in the age group of the 10- to 14-year-olds, without gender-specific difference. The seroprevalence study demonstrates a common spread of CA16 and EV71 in Germany, but a relatively high susceptibility of the younger population to CA16 and EV71. Obviously, the manifestation rate, i.e., distinct disease of these infections is low.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
EV71 was not detected in this cohort.
“We did not detect EV71 although this strain is reported to circulate in different European countries [18, 19].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 119
- Authors
- Rabenau, H. F., Richter, M., & Doerr, H. W.
- Affiliations
- Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Rabenau, Holger F.
- ORCID
- Rabenau, Holger F.
- Venue
- Medical Microbiology and Immunology
- Published
- 2009-11-26
- Volume
- 199
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 45-51
- ISSN
- 0044-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 0300-8584
- 1432-1831
- OpenAlex
- W2060089985
- Cited by
- 119
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 4.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Medical Microbiology and Immunology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Viral Infections and Immunology Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Literature Analysis and Criticism
- Keywords
- hand, foot and mouth disease, enterovirus 70, seroprevalence, neutralizing antibodies, age-specific susceptibility, children, seroepidemiology
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antibodies, Viral, Child, Child, Preschool, Enterovirus, Female, Germany, Hand, Foot and Mouth Disease, Humans, Infant, Male, Middle Aged, Seroepidemiologic Studies, Enterovirus A, Human, Young Adult, Antibodies, Neutralizing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review