Cited by 20Celiac Disease Research and ManagementEosinophilic EsophagitisChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life

Health-related quality of life in Spanish coeliac children using the generic KIDSCREEN-52 questionnaire

Barrio, Josefa, Cilleruelo, María Luz, Román, Enriqueta, Fernández, Cristina·2018·European Journal of Pediatrics

Abstract

The aim of this study is to assess the impact of coeliac disease (CD) on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) using the generic KIDSCREEN-52 questionnaire in a group of Spanish children aged 8-18 years and their parents. For this cross-sectional study, coeliac children in the targeted age range, who are members of the Madrid Coeliac Association (MCA), were invited to participate. The Spanish version of the generic KIDSCREEN-52 questionnaire was administered via e-mail. Scores (on a scale from 1 to 100) were expressed as the mean and standard deviation (SD). Demographic and clinical variables related to HRQOL were also assessed. The questionnaire was completed by 434 children and/or their parents. Respondents gave scores of over 50 to seven quality of life domains. Mean scores were significantly higher in children than in their parents for six out of ten domains. In contrast, parents awarded significantly higher scores to the "social support and peers" domain than children did. Significantly lower QOL scores were reported by girls, children aged 16-18 years, children older than 7 years at the time of CD diagnosis, and respondents who did not adhere to the prescribed diet or had difficulty in doing so. Conclusion Overall, the KIDSCREEN-52 questionnaire revealed that CD had no substantial negative impacts on the children's QOL. However, some concerns from the children's perspective were identified, such as issues regarding relationships with their peers. These issues will need…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00431-018-3204-0

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barrio, J., Cilleruelo, M. L., Román, E., & Fernández, C.
Affiliations
Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda (ES)
Venue
European Journal of Pediatrics
Published
2018-07-16
Volume
177
Issue
10
Pages
1515-1522
ISSN
  • 0340-6199 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1076
OpenAlex
W2884490416
Cited by
20
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2
FWCI
2.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Spanish National Institutes of Health Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria (PI 22/01183)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Celiac Disease Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Eosinophilic Esophagitis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Keywords
celiac disease, health-related quality of life, KIDSCREEN-52, children, parents, peer relationships, social support, dietary adherence, Spanish children
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Celiac Disease, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Language, Male, Parents, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Social Support, Spain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review