Cited by 89Marine Sponges and Natural ProductsMarine Invertebrate Physiology and EcologyEchinoderm biology and ecology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Prey capture and digestion in the carnivorous sponge Asbestopluma hypogea (Porifera: Demospongiae)

Vacelet, Jean, Duport, Eric·2004·Zoomorphology

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00435-004-0100-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A family of carnivorous, deep sea sponges (Cladorhizidae) shows a highly specialised mode of potential extracellular digestion.

    “A family of carnivorous, deep sea sponges (Cladorhizidae) shows however a highly specialised mode of potential extracellular digestion.”
  • They engulf their prey by pinacocytes and form a cyst where primary lysis occurs.

    “They engulf their prey by pinacocytes and form a cyst where primary lysis occurs.”
  • Their members feed by digesting copepods, and lack a canal system and choanocyte chambers.

    “Their members feed by digesting copepods, and lack a canal system and choanocyte chambers (Vacelet 2007; Vacelet and Boury-Esnault 1995; Vacelet and Duport 2004).”
  • Prey decomposition times strongly suggest the activity of extracellular enzymes, but there is currently no direct evidence for their involvement, or for their potential bacterial or poriferan origin.

    “Prey decomposition times strongly suggest the activity of extracellular enzymes, but there is currently no direct evidence for their involvement, or for their potential bacterial or poriferan origin (Vacelet and Duport 2004).”
  • Particles are subsequently phagocytosed and intracellularly digested by archaeocytes and so-called bacteriocytes.

    “Particles are subsequently phagocytosed and intracellularly digested by archaeocytes and so-called bacteriocytes.”

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 20 · Cited by 89

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Cheng TC, Yee HWF, Rifkin E, Kramer M (1968) Cellular reactions in Terpios zeteki to implanted heterologous biological materials. J Invert Pathol 12:29–35 · DOI
  2. Collins AG, Valentine JW (2001) Defining phyla: evolutionary pathways to animal body plans. Evol Dev 36:432–442 · DOI
  3. Connes R, Paris J, Sube J (1971) Réactions tissulaires de quelques démosponges vis à vis de leurs commensaux et parasites. Naturaliste Can 98:923–935
  4. Cotte J (1903) Contribution à l’étude de la nutrition chez les spongiaires. Bull Sci Fr Belg 38:420–573
  5. Dewel RA (2000) Colonial origin for Eumetazoa: major morphological transitions and the origin of bilaterian complexity. J Morphol 243:35–74 · DOI
  6. Grell KG, Ruthmann A (1991) Placozoa. In: Harrison FW (eds) Microscopic anatomy of invertebrates, vol 2. Placozoa, Porifera, Cnidaria, and Ctenophora. Wiley-Liss, New York, pp 13–27
  7. Hahn-Keser B, Stockem W (1997) Detection of distinct endocytotic and phagocytotic activities in epithelial cells (pinacocytes) of freshwater sponges (Porifera, Spongillidae). Zoomorphology 117:121–134 · DOI
  8. Hahn-Keser B, Stockem W (1998) Intracellular pathways and degradation of endosomal contents in basal epithelial cells of freshwater sponges (Porifera, Spongillidae). Zoomorphology 117:223–236 · DOI
  9. Hajdu E, Vacelet J (2002) Family Cladorhizidae. In: Hooper JNA, Soest RWM van (eds) Systema Porifera: a guide to the classification of sponges, vol 1. Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York, pp 636–641 · DOI
  10. Hooper JNA, Soest RWM van (2002) Introduction. In: Hooper JNA, Soest RWM van (eds) Systema Porifera: a guide to the classification of sponges, vol 1. Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York, pp 1–3 · DOI
  11. Ivanova EP, Bakunina IY, Gorshkova NM, Romanenko LA, Mikhailov VV, Elyakova LA, Parfenova VV (1993) Occurrence of chitin-decomposing enzymes in marine and freshwater microorganisms. Russ J Mar Biol 18:112–116
  12. Koltun VM (1970) Sponge fauna of the north-western Pacific from the shallows to the ultra-abyssal depths. Inst Oceanol Acad Sci USSR 86:165–221
  13. Kübler B, Barthel D (1999) A carnivorous sponge, Chondrocladia gigantea (Porifera: Demospongiae: Cladorhizidae), the giant deep-sea clubsponge from the Norwegian trench. Mem Queensl Mus 44:289–298
  14. Monniot C (1984) Les invertébrés suspensivores: adaptations à un régime carnivore chez les Tuniciers. Oceanis 10:605–621
  15. Monniot C, Monniot F (1975) Abyssal tunicates: an ecological paradox. Ann Inst Oceanogr 51:99–129
  16. Monniot C, Monniot F (1991) Découverte d’une nouvelle lignée évolutive chez les ascidies de grande profondeur: une Ascidiidae carnivore. C R Acad Sci Paris 312:383–388
  17. Passelaigue F, Bourdillon A (1986) Distribution and circadian migrations of the cavernicolous mysid Hemimysis speluncola Ledoyer. Stygologia 2:112–118
  18. Perez T (1996) La rétention de particules par une éponge hexactinellide, Oopsacas minuta (Leucopsacasidae): le rôle du réticulum. Particle uptake by a hexactinellid sponge, Oopsacas minuta (Leucopsacasidae): the role of the reticulum. C R Acad Sci Paris 319:385–391
  19. Reiswig HM (1971) Particle feeding in natural populations of three marine demosponges. Biol Bull 141:568–591 · DOI
  20. Schmidt I (1970) Phagocytose et pinocytose chez les Spongillidae. Z Vergl Physiol 66:398–420 · DOI
  21. Simpson TL (1984) The cell biology of sponges. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York · DOI
  22. Tuzet O, Paris J (1964) Réactions tissulaires de l’éponge Suberites domuncula (Olivi) Nardo, vis-à-vis de ses commensaux et parasites. Vie Milieu 17:147–155
  23. Vacelet J, Boury-Esnault N (1995) Carnivorous sponges. Nature 373:333–335 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Vacelet J, Boury-Esnault N (1996) A new species of carnivorous sponge (Demospongiae: Cladorhizidae) from a Mediterranean cave. Bull Inst R Sci Nat Belg 66(suppl):109–115
  25. Vacelet J, Boury-Esnault N, Harmelin JG (1994) Hexactinellid cave, a unique deep-sea habitat in the scuba zone. Deep-Sea Res 41:965–973 · DOI
  26. Vooren CM (1973) A note on the occurrence of small fishes in sponges. Tuatara 20:109–112
  27. Willenz P, Van de Vyver G (1984) Ultrastructural localization of lysosomal digestion in the freshwater sponge Ephydatia fluviatilis. J Ultrastruct Res 87:13–22 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Vacelet, J., & Duport, E.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Vacelet, Jean
Venue
Zoomorphology
Published
2004-04-27
Volume
123
Issue
4
Pages
179-190
ISSN
  • 0340-6725 (ISSN-L)
  • 0720-213X
  • 1432-234X
OpenAlex
W2155568995
Cited by
89
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Zoomorphology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Marine Sponges and Natural Products
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Echinoderm biology and ecology
Keywords
carnivorous sponges, Cladorhizidae, prey capture, extracellular digestion, phagocytosis, archaeocytes, bacteriocytes, deep-sea sponges

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review