Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 23

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A study of the Bodrogköz population in north-eastern Hungary by Y chromosomal haplotypes and haplogroups

Pamjav, Horolma, Fóthi, Á., Fehér, T., Fóthi, Erzsébet·2017·Molecular Genetics and Genomics

Abstract

We have determined the distribution of Y chromosomal haplotypes and haplogroups in population samples from one of the most important areas in north-eastern Hungary from many villages in the Bodrogköz. The Bodrogköz region was chosen due to its isolated nature, because this area was a moorland encircled by the Tisza, Bodrog, and Latorca Rivers and inhabitants of this part of Hungary escaped from both Tatar and Ottoman invasions, which decimated the post-Hungarian Conquest populations in many parts of the country. Furthermore, in the first half of the tenth century, this region served as the Palatial Centre and burial grounds of the Hungarian tribes. It has thus been assumed that the present population in this area is likely to be more similar to the population that lived in the Conquest period. We analysed male-specific markers, 23 Y-STRs and more than 30 Y-SNPs, that reflect the past and recent genetic history. We found that the general haplogroup distribution of the samples showed high genetic similarity to non-Bodrogköz Hungarians and neighbouring populations, despite its sheltered location and historical record. We were able to classify the Y-chromosomal haplogroups into four large groups based on STR mutation events: pre-Roman/Roman ancient lineage, Finno-Ugric speakers arriving into the Carpathian Basin, Migration period admixture, and post-Hungarian Conquest admixture. It is clear that a significantly larger database with deep haplogroup resolution, including ancient DN…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00438-017-1319-z

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Balloux F, Goudet J (2002) Statistical properties of population differentiation estimators under stepwise mutation in a finite island model. Mol Ecol 11(4):771–783 · DOI
  2. Bandelt HJ, Forster P, Röhl A (1999) Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 16:37–48 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bíró A, Fehér T, Bárány G, Pamjav H (2015) Testing Central and Inner Asian admixture among contemporary Hungarians. Forensic Sci Int Genet 121–126. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.11.007 (epub 2014 Nov 15) · DOI
  4. Bóna I (1987) A népvándorlás kor és a korai középkor története Magyarországon. In: Bartha A (ed) Magyarország története I. Akadémia Kiadó, Budapest, pp 265–373
  5. Cavalli-Sforza LL, Bodmer WF (1977) The genetics of human populations. W.H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco
  6. Csányi B, Bogácsi-Szabó E, Tömöry G, Czibula A, Priskin K, Csõsz A, Mende B, Langó P, Csete K, Zsolnai A, Conant EK, Downes CS, Raskó I (2008) Y-chromosome analysis of ancient Hungarian and two modern Hungarian-speaking populations from the Carpathian Basin. Ann Hum Genet 72(Pt 4):519–534. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.2008.00440.x (epub 2008) · DOI
  7. de Knijff P (2000) Messages through bottlenecks: on the combined use of slow and fast evolving polymorphic markers on the human Y chromosome. Am J Hum Genet 67:1055–1061 · DOI
  8. Di Cristofaro J, Pennarun E, Mazières S, Myres NM, Lin AA, Temori SA, Metspalu M, Metspalu E, Witzel M, King RJ, Underhill PA, Villems R, Chiaroni J (2013) Afghan Hindu Kush: where Eurasian sub-continent gene flows converge. PLoS One 8(10):e76748. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076748 (eCollection Mar 27) · DOI · Paper page
  9. Excoffier L, Lischer HEL (2010) Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Resour 10:564–567 · DOI
  10. Fehér T, Németh E, Vándor A, Kornienko IV, Csáji LK, Pamjav H (2015) Y-SNP L1034: limited genetic link between Mansi and Hungarian-speaking populations. Mol Genet Genom 290(1):377–386. doi: 10.1007/s00438-014-0925-2 (epub 2014 Sep 26) · DOI
  11. Goedbloed M, Vermeulen M, Fang RN, Lembring M, Wollstein A, Ballantyne K, Lao O, Brauer S, Krüger C, Roewer L, Lessig R, Ploski R, Dobosz T, Henke L, Henke J, Furtado MR, Kayser M (2009) Comprehensive mutation analysis of 17 Y-chromosomal short tandem repeat polymorphisms included in the AmpFlSTR Yfiler PCR amplification kit. Int J Legal Med 123(6):471–482. doi: 10.1007/s00414-009-0342-y (epub 2009 Mar 26) · DOI
  12. Hallast P, Batini C, Zadik D, Maisano Delser P, Wetton JH, Arroyo-Pardo E, Cavalleri GL, de Knijff P, Destro Bisol G, Dupuy BM, Eriksen HA, Jorde LB, King TE, Larmuseau MH, López de Munain A, López-Parra AM, Loutradis A, Milasin J, Novelletto A, Pamjav H, Sajantila A, Schempp W, Sears M, Tolun A, Tyler-Smith C, Van Geystelen A, Watkins S, Winney B, Jobling MA (2015) The Y-chromosome tree bursts into leaf: 13,000 high-confidence SNPs covering the majority of known clades. Mol Biol Evol 32(3):661–673. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu327 (epub 2014 Dec 2) · DOI
  13. Hardy OJ, Charbonnel N, Fréville H, Heuertz M (2003) Microsatellite allele sizes: a simple test to assess their significance on genetic differentiation. Genetics 163(4):1467–1482 · DOI
  14. Ilumäe AM, Reidla M, Chukhryaeva M, Järve M, Post H, Karmin M, Saag L, Agdzhoyan A, Kushniarevich A, Litvinov S, Ekomasova N, Tambets K, Metspalu E, Khusainova R, Yunusbayev B, Khusnutdinova EK, Osipova LP, Fedorova S, Utevska O, Koshel S, Balanovska E, Behar DM, Balanovsky O, Kivisild T, Underhill PA, Villems R, Rootsi S (2016) Human Y chromosome haplogroup N: a non-trivial time-resolved phylogeography that cuts across language families. Am J Hum Genet 99(1):163–167 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Jobling MA, Tyler-Smith C (2003) The human Y chromosome: an evolutionary marker comes of age. Nat Rev Genet 4:598–6123. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.05.025 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Karachanak S, Grugni V, Fornarino S, Nesheva D, Al-Zahery N, Battaglia V, Carossa V, Yordanov Y, Torroni A, Galabov AS, Toncheva D, Semino O (2013) Y-chromosome diversity in modern Bulgarians: new clues about their ancestry. PLoS One 8(3):e56779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056779 (epub 2013 Mar 6) · DOI
  17. Lahermo P, Laitinen V, Sistonen P, Béres J, Karcagi V, Savontaus ML (2000) MtDNA polymorphisms in the Hungarians: comparison to three other Finno-Ugric-speaking populations. Hereditas 132:35–42 · DOI
  18. Mielnik-Sikorska M, Daca P, Woźniak M, Malyarchuk BA, Bednarek J, Dobosz T, Grzybowski T (2013) Genetic data from Y chromosome STR and SNP loci in Ukrainian population. Forensic Sci Int Genet 7(1):200–203. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2012.05.007 (epub 2012 Jun 4) · DOI
  19. Mirabal S, Regueiro M, Cadenas AM, Cavalli-Sforza LL, Underhill PA, Verbenko DA, Limborska SA, Herrera RJ (2009) Y-Chromosome distribution within the geo linguistic landscape of northwestern Russia. Eur J Hum Genet 17(10):1260–1273 · DOI
  20. Niederstätter H, Rampl G, Erhart D, Pitterl F, Oberacher H, Neuhuber F, Hausner I, Gassner C, Schennach H, Berger B, Parson W (2012) Pasture names with romance and slavic roots facilitate dissection of Y chromosome variation in an exclusively German-speaking alpine region. PLoS One 7(7):e41885. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041885 (epub 2012 Jul 27) · DOI
  21. Sarno S, Tofanelli S, De Fanti S, Quagliariello A, Bortolini E, Ferri G, Anagnostou P, Brisighelli F, Capelli C, Tagarelli G, Sineo L, Luiselli D, Boattini A, Pettener D (2016) Shared language, diverging genetic histories: high-resolution analysis of Y-chromosome variability in Calabrian and Sicilian Arbereshe. Eur J Hum Genet 24(4):600–606. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.138 (epub 2015 Jul 1) · DOI
  22. Semino O, Passarini G, Quintana-Murci L, Lui A, Béres J, Czeizel A, Santachiara-Benerecetti AS (2000) MtDNA and Y chromosome polymorphisms in Hungary: inferences from the Palaeolithic, Neolithic and Uralic influences on the modern Hungarian gene pool. Am. J. Hum Genet 8:339–346 · DOI
  23. Underhill PA, Poznik GD, Rootsi S, Järve M, Lin AA, Wang J, Passarelli B, Kanbar J, Myres NM, King RJ, Di Cristofaro J, Sahakyan H, Behar DM, Kushniarevich A, Sarac J, Saric T, Rudan P, Pathak AK, Chaubey G, Grugni V, Semino O, Yepiskoposyan L, Bahmanimehr A, Farjadian S, Balanovsky O, Khusnutdinova EK, Herrera RJ, Chiaroni J, Bustamante CD, Quake SR, Kivisild T, Villems R (2015) The phylogenetic and geographic structure of Y-chromosome haplogroup R1a. Eur J Hum Genet 23(1):124–131. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.50 (epub 2014 Mar 26) · DOI
  24. Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern applied statistics with S, 4th edn. Springer, New York. ISBN 0-387-95457-0 · DOI
  25. Völgyi A, Zalán A, Szvetnik E, Pamjav H (2009) Hungarian population data for 11 Y-STR and 49 Y-SNP markers. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 3(2):e27–e28. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2008.04.006 (epub 2008 Jun 18) · DOI
  26. Willuweit S, Roewer L (2015) The new Y chromosome haplotype reference database. Forensic Sci Int Genet 15:43–48 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Pamjav, H., Fóthi, Á., Fehér, T., & Fóthi, E.
Venue
Molecular Genetics and Genomics
Published
2017-04-13
Volume
292
Issue
4
Pages
883-894
ISSN
  • 1617-4615
  • 1617-4623
Cited by
23
References
0
Language
en
Funders
Professor Miklós Maróth (GF/JSZF/814/9/2015)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review