Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 559

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comprehensive genetic testing in the clinical evaluation of 1119 patients with hearing loss

Open access
Sloan-Heggen, Christina M., Bierer, Amanda O., Shearer, A. Eliot, Kolbe, Diana L., Nishimura, Carla J., Frees, Kathy L., Ephraim, Sean S., Shibata, Seiji B., Booth, Kevin T., Campbell, Colleen A., Ranum, Paul T., Weaver, Amy E., Black-Ziegelbein, E. Ann, Wang, Donghong, Azaiez, Hela, Smith, Richard J. H.·2016·Human Genetics

Abstract

Hearing loss is the most common sensory deficit in humans, affecting 1 in 500 newborns. Due to its genetic heterogeneity, comprehensive diagnostic testing has not previously been completed in a large multiethnic cohort. To determine the aggregate contribution inheritance makes to non-syndromic hearing loss, we performed comprehensive clinical genetic testing with targeted genomic enrichment and massively parallel sequencing on 1119 sequentially accrued patients. No patient was excluded based on phenotype, inheritance or previous testing. Testing resulted in identification of the underlying genetic cause for hearing loss in 440 patients (39%). Pathogenic variants were found in 49 genes and included missense variants (49%), large copy number changes (18%), small insertions and deletions (18%), nonsense variants (8%), splice-site alterations (6%), and promoter variants (<1%). The diagnostic rate varied considerably based on phenotype and was highest for patients with a positive family history of hearing loss or when the loss was congenital and symmetric. The spectrum of implicated genes showed wide ethnic variability. These findings support the more efficient utilization of medical resources through the development of evidence-based algorithms for the diagnosis of hearing loss.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00439-016-1648-8

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Cited by

See all 559

Metadata

Authors
Sloan-Heggen, C. M., Bierer, A. O., Shearer, A. E., Kolbe, D. L., Nishimura, C. J., Frees, K. L., Ephraim, S. S., Shibata, S. B., Booth, K. T., Campbell, C. A., Ranum, P. T., Weaver, A. E., Black-Ziegelbein, E. A., Wang, D., Azaiez, H., & Smith, R. J. H.
Venue
Human Genetics
Published
2016-03-11
Volume
135
Issue
4
Pages
441-450
ISSN
  • 0018-7348 (ISSN-L)
  • 0340-6717
  • 1432-1203
OpenAlex
W2293733321
Cited by
559
References
26
FWCI
24.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comprehensive genetic testing in the clinical evaluation of 1119 patients with hearing loss. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00439-016-1648-8
The paper
Sloan-Heggen, C. M., Bierer, A. O., Shearer, A. E., Kolbe, D. L., Nishimura, C. J., Frees, K. L., Ephraim, S. S., Shibata, S. B., Booth, K. T., Campbell, C. A., Ranum, P. T., Weaver, A. E., Black-Ziegelbein, E. A., Wang, D., Azaiez, H., & Smith, R. J. H. (2016). Comprehensive genetic testing in the clinical evaluation of 1119 patients with hearing loss. Human Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-016-1648-8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.