Adolescence as a vulnerable period to alter rodent behavior
Abstract
Adolescence and puberty are highly important periods for postnatal brain maturation. During adolescence, drastic changes of neuronal architecture and function occur that concomitantly lead to distinct behavioral alterations. Unsurprisingly in view of the multitude of ongoing neurodevelopmental processes in the adolescent brain, most adult neuropsychiatric disorders have their roots exactly during this time span. Adolescence and puberty are therefore crucial developmental periods in terms of understanding the causes and mechanisms of adult mental illness. Valid animal models for adolescent behavior and neurodevelopment might offer better insights into the underlying mechanisms and help to identify specific time windows with heightened susceptibility during development. In order to increase the translational value of such models, we urgently need to define the detailed timing of adolescence and puberty in laboratory rodents. The aim of the present review is to provide a more precise delineation of the time course of these developmental periods during postnatal life in rats and mice and to discuss the impact of adolescence and related neurodevelopmental processes on the heightened susceptibility for mental disorders.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In rodents, adolescence is increasingly defined as the period from weaning (~PND 21) to neurobiological maturity around two months of age (~PND 60).
“adolescence in rodents is increasingly defined more in line with this larger age window in humans, by counting the period from weaning (~PND 21) where mice and rats gain begin to interact independently with their environments for the first time”
From Adolescent nicotine exposure and persistent neurocircuitry changes: unveiling lifelong psychiatric risks (2025) · cites this paper as [36]
Adolescence is evolutionarily conserved, with animal species also showing distinct markers of an adolescent state.
“it is increasingly recognized to be evolutionarily conserved, with animal species also showing distinct markers of an adolescent state [35–40].”
From Adolescent nicotine exposure and persistent neurocircuitry changes: unveiling lifelong psychiatric risks (2025) · cites this paper as [36]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 79 · Cited by 266
- Authors
- Schneider, M.
- Affiliations
- Heidelberg University (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Schneider, Miriam
- ORCID
- Schneider, Miriam
- Venue
- Cell and Tissue Research
- Published
- 2013-02-22
- Volume
- 354
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 99-106
- ISSN
- 0302-766X (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0878
- OpenAlex
- W2092602340
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 79
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6
- FWCI
- 2.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Cell and Tissue Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Keywords
- adolescence, puberty, brain development, adolescent behavior, animal models of psychiatric disorders, rats, mice, neuropsychiatric disorders, developmental vulnerability
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Behavior, Animal, Mental Disorders, Rodentia, Sexual Maturation, Mice, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review