Cited by 371Animal Vocal Communication and BehaviorMemory and Neural MechanismsNeuroendocrine regulation and behavior

Affective communication in rodents: ultrasonic vocalizations as a tool for research on emotion and motivation

Wöhr, Markus, Schwarting, Rainer K. W.·2013·Cell and Tissue Research

Abstract

Mice and rats emit and perceive calls in the ultrasonic range, i.e., above the human hearing threshold of about 20 kHz: so-called ultrasonic vocalizations (USV). Juvenile and adult rats emit 22-kHz USV in aversive situations, such as predator exposure and fighting or during drug withdrawal, whereas 50-kHz USV occur in appetitive situations, such as rough-and-tumble play and mating or in response to drugs of abuse, e.g., amphetamine. Aversive 22-kHz USV and appetitive 50-kHz USV serve distinct communicative functions. Whereas 22-kHz USV induce freezing behavior in the receiver, 50-kHz USV lead to social approach behavior. These opposite behavioral responses are paralleled by distinct patterns of brain activation. Freezing behavior in response to 22-kHz USV is paralleled by increased neuronal activity in brain areas regulating fear and anxiety, such as the amygdala and periaqueductal gray, whereas social approach behavior elicited by 50-kHz USV is accompanied by reduced activity levels in the amygdala but enhanced activity in the nucleus accumbens, a brain area implicated in reward processing. These opposing behavioral responses, together with distinct patterns of brain activation, particularly the bidirectional tonic activation or deactivation of the amygdala elicited by 22-kHz and 50-kHz USV, respectively, concur with a wealth of behavioral and neuroimaging studies in humans involving emotionally salient stimuli, such as fearful and happy facial expressions. Affective ultraso…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00441-013-1607-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 120 · Cited by 371

Authors
Wöhr, M., & Schwarting, R. K. W.
Affiliations
Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Wöhr, Markus
Venue
Cell and Tissue Research
Published
2013-04-11
Volume
354
Issue
1
Pages
81-97
ISSN
  • 0302-766X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0878
OpenAlex
W1963502320
Cited by
371
References
120
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6
FWCI
2.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cell and Tissue Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
Keywords
ultrasonic vocalizations, emotional communication, emotions, motivation, 22-kHz calls, 50-kHz calls, amygdala, nucleus accumbens, fear, social approach behavior, freezing behavior, social communication deficits, autism spectrum disorder, schizophrenia, rodent models, neurodevelopmental disorders
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Communication, Behavior, Animal, Emotions, Humans, Motivation, Rodentia, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review