Plant biomass and species composition along an environmental gradient in montane riparian meadows
Abstract
In riparian meadows, narrow zonation of the dominant vegetation frequently occurs along the elevational gradient from the stream edge to the floodplain terrace. We measured plant species composition and above- and belowground biomass in three riparian plant communities-a priori defined as wet, moist, and dry meadow-along short streamside topographic gradients in two montane meadows in northeast Oregon. The objectives were to: (1). compare above- and belowground biomass in the three meadow communities; (2). examine relations among plant species richness, biomass distribution, water table depth, and soil redox potential along the streamside elevational gradients. We installed wells and platinum electrodes along transects (perpendicular to the stream; n=5 per site) through the three plant communities, and monitored water table depth and soil redox potential (10 and 25 cm depth) from July 1997 to August 1999. Mean water table depth and soil redox potential differed significantly along the transects, and characterized a strong environmental gradient. Community differences in plant species composition were reflected in biomass distribution. Highest total biomass (live+dead) occurred in the sedge-dominated wet meadows (4311+/-289 g/m(2)), intermediate biomass (2236+/-221 g/m(2)) was seen in the moist meadow communities, dominated by grasses and sedges, and lowest biomass (1403+/-113 g/m(2)) was observed in the more diverse dry meadows, dominated by grasses and forbs. In the wet and…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Dry-meadow vegetation has only one-fifth to one-third the below-ground biomass of wet-meadow communities.
“Dwire et al. (2004) found the below-ground biomass of dry-meadow vegetation to be only one-fifth to one-third that of wet-meadow plant communities.”
From River channel dynamics following extirpation of wolves in northwestern Yellowstone National Park, USA (2006) · cites this paper as Dwire et al., 2004
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Beschta, R. L., & Ripple, W. J. (2006) · Earth Surface Processes and Landforms · doi:10.1002/esp.1362 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dwire, K. A., Kauffman, J. B., Brookshire, E. N. J., & Baham, J. E.
- Affiliations
- Oregon State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dwire, Kathleen A.
- Venue
- Oecologia
- Published
- 2004-04-01
- Volume
- 139
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 309-317
- ISSN
- 0029-8549 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1939
- OpenAlex
- W2163328077
- Cited by
- 96
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 4.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Oecologia (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
- U.S. Forest Service
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Ecology and biodiversity studies
- Keywords
- riparian meadows, montane meadows, plant biomass, species composition, elevation gradient, water table depth, soil redox potential, belowground biomass, aboveground biomass, species richness, wet meadows, dry meadows, Cyperaceae, graminoids, floodplain terraces
- MeSH terms
- Altitude, Environmental Monitoring, Poaceae, Oxidation-Reduction, Population Dynamics, Soil, Ecosystem, Biomass, Cyperaceae
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review