Cited by 96Hydrology and Sediment Transport ProcessesEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesEcology and biodiversity studies

Plant biomass and species composition along an environmental gradient in montane riparian meadows

Dwire, Kathleen A., Kauffman, J. Boone, Brookshire, E. N. Jack, Baham, John E.·2004·Oecologia

Abstract

In riparian meadows, narrow zonation of the dominant vegetation frequently occurs along the elevational gradient from the stream edge to the floodplain terrace. We measured plant species composition and above- and belowground biomass in three riparian plant communities-a priori defined as wet, moist, and dry meadow-along short streamside topographic gradients in two montane meadows in northeast Oregon. The objectives were to: (1). compare above- and belowground biomass in the three meadow communities; (2). examine relations among plant species richness, biomass distribution, water table depth, and soil redox potential along the streamside elevational gradients. We installed wells and platinum electrodes along transects (perpendicular to the stream; n=5 per site) through the three plant communities, and monitored water table depth and soil redox potential (10 and 25 cm depth) from July 1997 to August 1999. Mean water table depth and soil redox potential differed significantly along the transects, and characterized a strong environmental gradient. Community differences in plant species composition were reflected in biomass distribution. Highest total biomass (live+dead) occurred in the sedge-dominated wet meadows (4311+/-289 g/m(2)), intermediate biomass (2236+/-221 g/m(2)) was seen in the moist meadow communities, dominated by grasses and sedges, and lowest biomass (1403+/-113 g/m(2)) was observed in the more diverse dry meadows, dominated by grasses and forbs. In the wet and…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00442-004-1498-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dwire, K. A., Kauffman, J. B., Brookshire, E. N. J., & Baham, J. E.
Affiliations
Oregon State University (US)
Corresponding author
Dwire, Kathleen A.
Venue
Oecologia
Published
2004-04-01
Volume
139
Issue
2
Pages
309-317
ISSN
  • 0029-8549 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1939
OpenAlex
W2163328077
Cited by
96
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Oecologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
  • U.S. Forest Service
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Ecology and biodiversity studies
Keywords
riparian meadows, montane meadows, plant biomass, species composition, elevation gradient, water table depth, soil redox potential, belowground biomass, aboveground biomass, species richness, wet meadows, dry meadows, Cyperaceae, graminoids, floodplain terraces
MeSH terms
Altitude, Environmental Monitoring, Poaceae, Oxidation-Reduction, Population Dynamics, Soil, Ecosystem, Biomass, Cyperaceae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review