Cited by 102Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesBotany and Plant Ecology StudiesAnimal Ecology and Behavior Studies

Are boreal ecosystems susceptible to alien plant invasion? Evidence from protected areas

Rose, Michael, Hermanutz, Luise·2004·Oecologia

Abstract

Although biological invasion by alien species is a major contributor to loss of indigenous biological diversity, few studies have examined the susceptibility of the boreal biome to invasion. Based on studies of other ecosystems, we hypothesized that alien plants will be restricted to disturbed areas near human activity and will not be found in natural areas of boreal ecosystems in Gros Morne National Park (Canada), a protected area experiencing a wide range of disturbance regimes. The distribution of alien plants in the region was evaluated using surveys, and study sites were established in naturally and anthropogenically disturbed habitats that had been invaded. Within study sites, randomization tests evaluated the importance of disturbance to alien plant invasion by examining changes in environmental conditions and species abundance within various disturbance regimes, while the importance of site characteristics limiting the distribution of alien plants were examined using Canonical Correspondence Analysis. Consistent with studies in a variety of biomes, areas of high disturbance and human activity had the greatest abundance of resources and the highest percentage of alien species. However, contrary to our hypothesis, natural areas of boreal ecosystems were found susceptible to alien plant invasion. Vegetation types vulnerable to invasion include forests, riparian areas, fens, and alpine meadows. Natural disturbance occurring in these vegetation types caused increases in ba…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00442-004-1527-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Alien plants can invade natural areas that have not experienced obvious anthropogenic disturbances, such as the Gros Morne National Park in boreal Canada.

    “Few protected areas are completely free of alien plants (Foxcroft et al., 2017), and alien plants can invade natural areas that have not experienced obvious anthropogenic disturbances, such as the Gros Morne National Park in boreal Canada (Rose & Hermanutz, 2004).”

    From Scientists' warning on invasive alien species (2020) · cites this paper as Rose & Hermanutz, 2004

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rose, M., & Hermanutz, L.
Affiliations
Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA)
Corresponding author
Hermanutz, Luise
Venue
Oecologia
Published
2004-05-01
Volume
139
Issue
3
Pages
467-477
ISSN
  • 0029-8549 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1939
OpenAlex
W2068657672
Cited by
102
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Oecologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Parks Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Botany and Plant Ecology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
Keywords
alien plant invasion, boreal ecosystems, disturbance regimes, protected areas, Gros Morne National Park, moose, soil pH, bare ground, light availability, riparian vegetation, fens, alpine meadow, natural disturbance
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Conservation of Natural Resources, Environment, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Monte Carlo Method, Newfoundland and Labrador, Population Dynamics, Soil, Ecosystem, Plant Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review