Cited by 75Isotope Analysis in EcologyFish biology, ecology, and behaviorFish Ecology and Management Studies

Terrestrial–aquatic trophic linkages support fish production in a tropical oligotrophic river

Correa, Sandra Bibiana, Winemiller, Kirk·2018·Oecologia

Abstract

Despite low in situ primary productivity, tropical oligotrophic rivers support highly diverse fish assemblages and productive fisheries. This raises the question, what energy sources support fish production in these ecosystems? We sampled fish and food resources in the floodplain of a nearly pristine, large, oligotrophic river in western Amazonia. We combined data from stomach contents and stable isotopes to test the hypothesis that floodplain forests sustain fisheries in tropical oligotrophic rivers. Analysis of stomach contents from > 800 specimens of 12 omnivorous fish species demonstrated that during the annual flood, forest plant matter dominated diets. Yet, our isotope mixing models estimated that arthropods from the forest canopy made a greater proportional contribution to fish biomass. Most of these arthropods are entirely terrestrial and, therefore, serve as trophic links between forests and fishes. Our results suggest that forest vegetation, particularly fruits, may provide much of the energy supporting metabolism and arthropods contribute significant amounts of protein for somatic growth. Moreover, the importance of terrestrial arthropods in support of fish biomass in oligotrophic rivers depends on interactions between riparian vegetation, terrestrial arthropods and flood pulse dynamics affecting accessibility of arthropods to fishes. The apparent paradox of high fish diversity in an oligotrophic river with low primary productivity may be explained, at least partia…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00442-018-4093-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Correa, S. B., & Winemiller, K.
Affiliations
Texas A&M University (US)
Corresponding author
Correa, Sandra Bibiana
Venue
Oecologia
Published
2018-02-17
Volume
186
Issue
4
Pages
1069-1078
ISSN
  • 0029-8549 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1939
OpenAlex
W2792943627
Cited by
75
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3
FWCI
5.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Oecologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Wildlife Conservation Society (3602)
  • The estate of Carolyn Wierichs Kelso
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Isotope Analysis in Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish biology, ecology, and behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
Keywords
floodplain fisheries, fish diet, terrestrial arthropods, floodplain forests, flood pulse, riparian vegetation, stable isotope mixing models, stomach contents, fish biomass, Amazonian fisheries, omnivorous fish
MeSH terms
Animals, Brazil, Fishes, Ecosystem, Food Chain, Rivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review