Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,059

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mechanisms determining the degree of size asymmetry in competition among plants

Schwinning, Susanne, Weiner, Jacob·1998·Oecologia

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s004420050397

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

  • Comparative photosynthesis of sun and shade plants

    Boardman, N. K. (1977) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.28.060177.002035 · Cited by 1,826 · cited 1×

    “For example, plants that are primarily limited by light will often allocate relatively more biomass to shoots than to roots than when they are limited by soil resources, and their leaves will maintain more lightcapturing pigments and fewer dark-reaction enzymes (Boardman 1977).”
    Background

Cited by

See all 1,059

Metadata

Authors
Schwinning, S., & Weiner, J.
Venue
Oecologia
Published
1998-02-13
Volume
113
Issue
4
Pages
447-455
ISSN
  • 0029-8549 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1939
OpenAlex
W2105110063
Cited by
1,059
References
1
FWCI
18.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.