Cited by 59Animal Behavior and ReproductionAvian ecology and behaviorEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

Mate fidelity and coloniality in waterbirds: a comparative analysis

Dubois, Frédérique, Cézilly, Frank, Pagel, Mark·1998·Oecologia

Abstract

Increased opportunities for information are one potential benefit of sociality. We apply this idea to the advantages of colonial breeding in bird species that are typically monogamous within a breeding season but often form new pair-bonds in subsequent seasons. Individuals may benefit from nesting in colonies at high density by identifying good-quality potential alternative mates among their neighbours. The opportunities for finding a better mating option are likely to increase with colony size and density. We tested this prediction with a comparative analysis of the association between mate fidelity and coloniality in waterbirds (wading birds and seabirds), where there is wide variation in both the degree of mate retention over consecutive breeding seasons and the degree of coloniality. We used two comparative statistical analyses, one based upon generalized least squares and the other based upon a continuous-time Markov model, to test whether the pattern of association between divorce rate and degree of coloniality was evidence for correlated evolutionary change in the two characters. We found a significant and positive association between divorce rate and the degree of coloniality in waterbirds. The probable ancestral state corresponds to a combination of a high degree of coloniality with no, or weak, mate fidelity. The reconstruction of the historical pattern of character origin and evolution indicates that the transition from a high to a low degree of coloniality occurre…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s004420050607

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social bonds in birds reflect a lifetime of interactions for evaluating mate choice, and for establishing relationships and parental behavior.

    “Social bonds in birds reflect a lifetime of interactions for evaluating mate choice (Dubois et al., 1998), and for establishing relationships and parental behavior (Fraser and Bugnyar, 2010).”

    From Husbandry and enclosure influences on penguin behavior and conservation breeding (2016) · cites this paper as Dubois et al., 1998

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 64 · Cited by 59

Authors
Dubois, F., Cézilly, F., & Pagel, M.
Affiliations
  • Université de Bourgogne (FR)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
Oecologia
Published
1998-09-03
Volume
116
Issue
3
Pages
433-440
ISSN
  • 0029-8549 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1939
OpenAlex
W2069043038
Cited by
59
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Oecologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
mate fidelity, coloniality, waterbirds, wading birds, seabirds, divorce rates, pair bonding, monogamy, colony size, sociality, correlated evolution, ancestral state reconstruction, character evolution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review