Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 390

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Robot-assisted endoscopic surgery for thyroid cancer: experience with the first 100 patients

Open access
Kang, Sang-Wook, Jeong, Jong Ju, Yun, Ji-Sup, Sung, Tae Yon, Lee, Seung Chul, Lee, Yong Sang, Nam, Kee-Hyun, Chang, Hang Seok, Chung, Woong Youn, Park, Cheong Soo·2009·Surgical Endoscopy

Abstract

BackgroundVarious robotic surgical procedures have been performed in recent years, and most reports have proved that the application of robotic technology for surgery is technically feasible and safe. This study aimed to introduce the authors’ technique of robot-assisted endoscopic thyroid surgery and to demonstrate its applicability in the surgical management of thyroid cancer.MethodsFrom 4 October 2007 through 14 March 2008, 100 patients with papillary thyroid cancer underwent robot-assisted endoscopic thyroid surgery using a gasless transaxillary approach. This novel robotic surgical approach allowed adequate endoscopic access for thyroid surgeries. All the procedures were completed successfully using the da Vinci S surgical robot system. Four robotic arms were used with this system: a 12-mm telescope and three 8-mm instruments. The three-dimensional magnified visualization obtained by the dual-channel endoscope and the tremor-free instruments controlled by the robotic systems allowed surgeons to perform sharp and precise endoscopic dissections.ResultsIpsilateral central compartment node dissection was used for 84 less-than-total and 16 total thyroidectomies. The mean operation time was 136.5 min (range, 79–267 min). The actual time for thyroidectomy with lymphadenectomy (console time) was 60 min (range, 25–157 min). The average number of lymph nodes resected was 5.3 (range, 1–28). No serious complications occurred. Most of the patients could return home within 3 days after surgery.ConclusionsThe technique of robot-assisted endoscopic thyroid surgery using a gasless transaxillary approach is a feasible, safe, and effective method for selected patients with thyroid cancer. The authors suggest that application of robotic technology for endoscopic thyroid surgeries could overcome the limitations of conventional endoscopic surgeries in the surgical management of thyroid cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00464-009-0366-x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 390

Metadata

Authors
Kang, S.-W., Jeong, J. J., Yun, J.-S., Sung, T. Y., Lee, S. C., Lee, Y. S., Nam, K.-H., Chang, H. S., Chung, W. Y., & Park, C. S.
Venue
Surgical Endoscopy
Published
2009-03-05
Volume
23
Issue
11
Pages
2399-2406
ISSN
  • 0930-2794 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2218
OpenAlex
W2078723282
Cited by
390
References
1
FWCI
30.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Robot-assisted endoscopic surgery for thyroid cancer: experience with the first 100 patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00464-009-0366-x
The paper
Kang, S.-W., Jeong, J. J., Yun, J.-S., Sung, T. Y., Lee, S. C., Lee, Y. S., Nam, K.-H., Chang, H. S., Chung, W. Y., & Park, C. S. (2009). Robot-assisted endoscopic surgery for thyroid cancer: experience with the first 100 patients. Surgical Endoscopy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0366-x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.