The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Physicomechanical evaluation of absorbable and nonabsorbable barrier composite meshes for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“While complications such as chronic pain, fistula formation, and mesh infections are well‐documented with non‐resorbable meshes [10], few studies have addressed whether similar late‐onset adverse events occur with biosynthetic meshes after their complete degradation [6].”
From Long‐Term Outcomes After Slowly Resorbable P4HB Mesh Implantation: A Multicenter Analysis From European Registry (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“IPOM placement was associated with doubled recurrence rate compared to the onlay approach, while the sublay technique did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in comparison to the onlay technique [2, 10, 16].”
From Long‐Term Outcomes After Slowly Resorbable P4HB Mesh Implantation: A Multicenter Analysis From European Registry (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“IPOM placement was associated with doubled recurrence rate compared to the onlay approach, while the sublay technique did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in comparison to the onlay technique [2, 10, 16].”
From Long‐Term Outcomes After Slowly Resorbable P4HB Mesh Implantation: A Multicenter Analysis From European Registry (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Resorbable meshes such as P4HB were developed to mitigate these complications in high‐risk or contaminated environments [10].”
From Long‐Term Outcomes After Slowly Resorbable P4HB Mesh Implantation: A Multicenter Analysis From European Registry (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“P4HB has demonstrated favorable integration and low long‐term infection rates, owing to complete resorption within 12–18 months [10].”
From Long‐Term Outcomes After Slowly Resorbable P4HB Mesh Implantation: A Multicenter Analysis From European Registry (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
1 more claim about this paper
Create a free account to see every claim other papers make about this one.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- Burger JW, Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, Halm JA, Verdaasdonk EG, Jeekel J (2004) Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg 240:578–583 · DOI · Paper page
- Heniford BT, Park A, Ramshaw BJ, Voeller G (2003) Laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias: nine years’ experience with 850 consecutive hernias. Ann Surg 238:391–399 · DOI
- Pierce RA, Spitler JA, Frisella MM, Matthews BD, Brunt LM (2007) Pooled data analysis of laparoscopic vs open ventral hernia repair: 14 years of patient data accrual. Surg Endosc 21:378–386 · DOI
- Ray NF, Denton WG, Thamer M, Henderson SC, Perry S (1998) Abdominal adhesiolysis: inpatient care and expenditures in the United States in 1994. J Am Coll Surg 186:1–9 · DOI
- Halm JA, de Wall LL, Steyerberg EW, Jeekel J, Lange JF (2007) Intraperitoneal polypropylene mesh hernia repair complicates subsequent abdominal surgery. World J Surg 31:423–429 · DOI
- Pierce RA, Perrone J, Nimeri A, Sexton J, Walcutt J, Frisella M, Matthews B (2009) 120-Day comparative analysis of adhesion grade and quantity, mesh contraction, and tissue response to a novel omega-3 fatty acid bioabsorbable barrier macroporous mesh after intraperitoneal placement. Surg Innov 16:46–54 · DOI
- van’t Riet M, de Vos van Steenwijk PJ, Bonthuis F, Marquet RL, Steyerberg EW, Jeekel J, Bonjer HJ (2002) Prevention of adhesion to prosthetic mesh: comparison of different barriers using an incisional hernia model. Ann Surg 237:123–128 · DOI
- Schreinemacher MH, Emans PJ, Gijbels MJ, Greve JW, Beets GL, Bouvy ND (2009) Degradation of mesh coatings and intraperitoneal adhesion formation in an experimental model. Br J Surg 96:305–313 · DOI
- Tingstedt B, Isaksson K, Andersson E, Andersson R (2007) Prevention of abdominal adhesions: present state and what’s beyond the horizon? Eur Surg Res 39:259–268 · DOI
- Cobb WS, Peindl RM, Zerey M, Carbonell AM, Heniford BT (2009) Mesh terminology 101. Hernia 13:1–6 · DOI
- Bringman S, Conze J, Cuccurullo D, Deprest J, Junge K, Klosterhalfen B, Parra-Davila E, Ramshaw B, Schumpelick V (2010) Hernia repair: the search for ideal meshes. Hernia 14:81–87 · DOI
- Earle DB, Mark LA (2008) Prosthetic material in inguinal hernia repair: how do I choose? Surg Clin North Am 88:179–201 · DOI
- Amid PK (1997) Classification of biomaterials and their related complications in abdominal wall hernia surgery. Hernia 1:15–21 · DOI
- White RA, Hirose FM, Sproat RW, Lawrence RS, Nelson RJ (1981) Histopathologic observations after short-term implantation of two porous elastomers in dogs. Biomaterials 2:171–176 · DOI
- Welty G, Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Kasperk R, Schumpelick V (2001) Functional impairment and complaints following incisional hernia repair with different polypropylene meshes. Hernia 5:142–147 · DOI
- Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Birkenhauer V, Junge K, Conze J, Schumpelick V (2002) Impact of polymer pore size on the interface scar formation in a rat model. J Surg Res 103:208–214 · DOI · Paper page
- Greca FH, de Paula JB, Biondo-Simoes ML, da Costa FD, da Silva AP, Time S, Mansur A (2001) The influence of differing pore sizes on the biocompatibility of two polypropylene meshes in the repair of abdominal defects: experimental study in dogs. Hernia 5:59–64 · DOI · Paper page
- Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Muller M, Schumpelick V (1999) Foreign body reaction to meshes used for the repair of abdominal wall hernias. Eur J Surg 165:665–673 · DOI
- Bay-Nielson M (2007) Pain and functional impairment 1 year after inguinal herniorrhaphy: a nationwide questionnaire study. Ann Surg 233:1–7 · DOI
- Soares BM, King MW, Marois Y, Guidoin RG, Laroche G, Charara J, Girard JF (1996) In vitro characterization of a fluoropassivated gelatin-impregnated polyester mesh for hernia repair. J Biomed Mater Res 32:259–270 · DOI
- Schmidt R, Thews G (1977) Physiologie des Menschen. Springer, Berlin, Germany · DOI
- Hibbeler R (2001) Engineering mechanics: statics, 9th edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
- Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Conze J, Limberg W, Obolenski B, Ottinger AP, Schumpelick V (1998) Modified mesh for hernia repair that is adapted to the physiology of the abdominal wall. Eur J Surg 164:951–960 · DOI
- van’t Riet M, van Steenwijk PJ, Kleinrensink GJ, Steyerberg EW, Bonjer HJ (2002) Tensile strength of mesh fixation methods in laparoscopic incisional hernia repair. Surg Endosc 16:1713–1716 · DOI
- Melman L, Jenkins E, Brodt M, Deeken C, Frisella M, Matthews B (2009) Evaluation of acute fixation strength for mechanical tacking and fibrin sealant versus polypropylene suture for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. European Hernia Society, Berlin, Germany
- Klosterhalfen B, Junge K, Klinge U (2005) The lightweight and large porous mesh concept for hernia repair. Expert Rev Med Devices 2:103–117 · DOI
- Cobb WS, Burns JM, Kercher KW, Matthews BD, James NH, Todd HB (2005) Normal intraabdominal pressure in healthy adults. J Surg Res 129:231–235 · DOI
- Junge K, Klinge U, Prescher A, Giboni P, Niewiera M, Schumpelick V (2001) Elasticity of the anterior abdominal wall and impact for reparation of incisional hernias using mesh implants. Hernia 5:113–118 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
van den Berg, R., Wieser, M., López‐Cano, M., Bueno‐Lledó, J., Köckerling, F., Chatzimavroudis, G., Gonella‐Pacchiotti, C., Stabilini, C., Ortega‐Deballon, P., Romain, B., et al. (2026) · World Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/wjs.70331 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Deeken, C. R., Abdo, M. S., Frisella, M. M., & Matthews, B. D.
- Venue
- Surgical Endoscopy
- Published
- 2010-10-26
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1541-1552
- ISSN
- 0930-2794
- 1432-2218
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
