Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 23

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mediumweight polypropylene mesh fractures after open retromuscular ventral hernia repair: incidence and associated risk factors

Maskal, Sara, Miller, Benjamin, Ellis, Ryan, Phillips, Sharon, Prabhu, Ajita, Beffa, Lucas, Krpata, David, Rosenblatt, Steven, Rosen, Michael, Petro, Clayton·2023·Surgical Endoscopy
DOI 10.1007/s00464-023-10039-4
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00464-023-10039-4

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, van den Tol MP et al (2000) A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med 343(6):392–398. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200008103430603 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Burger JWA, Luijendijk RW, Hop WCJ, Halm JA, Verdaasdonk EGG, Jeekel J (2004) Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg 240(4):578–583. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000141193.08524.e7 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Rosen Michael (2016) Atlas of Abdominal Wall Reconstruction. Elsevier Health Sciences, Amsterdam
  4. Schmidbauer S, Ladurner R, Hallfeldt KK, Mussack T (2005) Heavy-weight versus low-weight polypropylene meshes for open sublay mesh repair of incisional hernia. Eur J Med Res 10(6):247–253
  5. Cobb WS, Kercher KW, Heniford BT (2005) The argument for lightweight polypropylene mesh in hernia repair. Surg Innov 12(1):63–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/155335060501200109 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Junge K, Klinge U, Prescher A, Giboni P, Niewiera M, Schumpelick V (2001) Elasticity of the anterior abdominal wall and impact for reparation of incisional hernias using mesh implants. Hernia. 5(3):113–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100290100019 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Žuvela M, Galun D, Djurić-Stefanović A, Palibrk I, Petrović M, Milićević M (2014) Central rupture and bulging of low-weight polypropylene mesh following recurrent incisional sublay hernioplasty. Hernia 18(1):135–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-013-1197-1 · DOI
  8. Petro CC, Nahabet EH, Criss CN et al (2015) Central failures of lightweight monofilament polyester mesh causing hernia recurrence: a cautionary note. Hernia 19(1):155–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-014-1237-5 · DOI
  9. Conze J, Kingsnorth AN, Flament JB et al (2005) Randomized clinical trial comparing lightweight composite mesh with polyester or polypropylene mesh for incisional hernia repair. Br J Surg 92(12):1488–1493. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5208 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Wang See C, Kim T, Zhu D (2020) Hernia mesh and hernia repair: a review. Eng Regen 1:19–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engreg.2020.05.002 · DOI
  11. Poulose BK, Roll S, Murphy JW et al (2016) Design and implementation of the Americas Hernia society quality collaborative (AHSQC): improving value in hernia care. Hernia J Hernias Abdom Wall Surg 20(2):177–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-016-1477-7 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Baucom RB, Ousley J, Feurer ID et al (2016) Patient reported outcomes after incisional hernia repair—establishing the ventral hernia recurrence inventory. Am J Surg 212(1):81–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.06.007 · DOI
  13. Warren JA, McGrath SP, Hale AL, Ewing JA, Carbonell AM, Cobb WS (2017) Patterns of recurrence and mechanisms of failure after open ventral hernia repair with mesh. Am Surg 83(11):1275–1282. https://doi.org/10.1177/000313481708301131 · DOI
  14. Sanbhal N, Miao L, Xu R, Khatri A, Wang L (2018) Physical structure and mechanical properties of knitted hernia mesh materials: a review. J Ind Text 48(1):333–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/1528083717690613 · DOI
  15. Blatnik JA, Krpata DM, Jacobs MR, Gao Y, Novitsky YW, Rosen MJ (2012) In vivo analysis of the morphologic characteristics of synthetic mesh to resist MRSA adherence. J Gastrointest Surg 16(11):2139–2144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-012-1992-5 · DOI
  16. Posielski NM, Yee ST, Majumder A, Orenstein SB, Prabhu AS, Novitsky YW (2015) Repair of massive ventral hernias with “quilted” mesh. Hernia 19(3):465–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-015-1375-4 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 23

Metadata

Authors
Maskal, S., Miller, B., Ellis, R., Phillips, S., Prabhu, A., Beffa, L., Krpata, D., Rosenblatt, S., Rosen, M., & Petro, C.
Venue
Surgical Endoscopy
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2023-04-10
Volume
37
Issue
7
Pages
5438-5443
ISSN
  • 0930-2794
  • 1432-2218
DOI
10.1007/s00464-023-10039-4
Cited by
23
References
1
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mediumweight polypropylene mesh fractures after open retromuscular ventral hernia repair: incidence and associated risk factors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00464-023-10039-4
The paper
Maskal, S., Miller, B., Ellis, R., Phillips, S., Prabhu, A., Beffa, L., Krpata, D., Rosenblatt, S., Rosen, M., & Petro, C. (2023). Mediumweight polypropylene mesh fractures after open retromuscular ventral hernia repair: incidence and associated risk factors. Surgical Endoscopy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10039-4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.