Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 389

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 96 of the 96 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

IPNA clinical practice recommendations for the diagnosis and management of children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome

Open access
on behalf of the International Pediatric Nephrology Association, Trautmann, Agnes, Vivarelli, Marina, Samuel, Susan, Gipson, Debbie, Sinha, Aditi, Schaefer, Franz, Hui, Ng Kar, Boyer, Olivia, Saleem, Moin A, Feltran, Luciana, Müller-Deile, Janina, Becker, Jan Ulrich, Cano, Francisco, Xu, Hong, Lim, Yam Ngo, Smoyer, William, Anochie, Ifeoma, Nakanishi, Koichi, Hodson, Elisabeth, Haffner, Dieter·2020·Pediatric Nephrology

Abstract

Idiopathic nephrotic syndrome newly affects 1–3 per 100,000 children per year. Approximately 85% of cases show complete remission of proteinuria following glucocorticoid treatment. Patients who do not achieve complete remission within 4–6 weeks of glucocorticoid treatment have steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS). In 10–30% of steroid-resistant patients, mutations in podocyte-associated genes can be detected, whereas an undefined circulating factor of immune origin is assumed in the remaining ones. Diagnosis and management of SRNS is a great challenge due to its heterogeneous etiology, frequent lack of remission by further immunosuppressive treatment, and severe complications including the development of end-stage kidney disease and recurrence after renal transplantation. A team of experts including pediatric nephrologists and renal geneticists from the International Pediatric Nephrology Association (IPNA), a renal pathologist, and an adult nephrologist have now developed comprehensive clinical practice recommendations on the diagnosis and management of SRNS in children. The team performed a systematic literature review on 9 clinically relevant PICO (P atient or P opulation covered,I ntervention,C omparator,O utcome) questions, formulated recommendations and formally graded them at a consensus meeting, with input from patient representatives and a dietician acting as external advisors and a voting panel of pediatric nephrologists. Research recommendations are also given.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00467-020-04519-1

Cites

96 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 96 references

Metadata

Authors
on behalf of the International Pediatric Nephrology Association, Trautmann, A., Vivarelli, M., Samuel, S., Gipson, D., Sinha, A., Schaefer, F., Hui, N. K., Boyer, O., Saleem, M. A., Feltran, L., Müller-Deile, J., Becker, J. U., Cano, F., Xu, H., Lim, Y. N., Smoyer, W., Anochie, I., Nakanishi, K., Hodson, E., & Haffner, D.
Venue
Pediatric Nephrology
Published
2020-05-07
Volume
35
Issue
8
Pages
1529-1561
ISSN
  • 0931-041X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-198X
OpenAlex
W3021746826
Cited by
389
References
96
FWCI
26.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: IPNA clinical practice recommendations for the diagnosis and management of children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00467-020-04519-1
The paper
on behalf of the International Pediatric Nephrology Association, Trautmann, A., Vivarelli, M., Samuel, S., Gipson, D., Sinha, A., Schaefer, F., Hui, N. K., Boyer, O., Saleem, M. A., Feltran, L., Müller-Deile, J., Becker, J. U., Cano, F., Xu, H., Lim, Y. N., Smoyer, W., Anochie, I., Nakanishi, K., . . . Haffner, D. (2020). IPNA clinical practice recommendations for the diagnosis and management of children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. Pediatric Nephrology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-020-04519-1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.