The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measurement of urinary concentration: a critical appraisal of methodologies
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Although urine osmolality is more valid and reliable than other field-accessible methods, 244 its cost typically precludes use by ATs.”
From National Athletic Trainers' Association Position Statement: Fluid Replacement for the Physically Active (2017) · cites this paper as [244]
In the citing paper
“Urine refractometry results are valid compared with more complicated but time-tested measures of urine concentration, such as urine osmolality. 244”
From National Athletic Trainers' Association Position Statement: Fluid Replacement for the Physically Active (2017) · cites this paper as [244]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
Martin Bland, J., & Altman, D. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8 · Cited by 47,965
Cited by
Dehydration: Physiology, Assessment, and Performance Effects
Cheuvront, S. N., & Kenefick, R. W. (2014) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.c130017 · Cited by 461
McDermott, B. P., Anderson, S. A., Armstrong, L. E., Casa, D. J., Cheuvront, S. N., Cooper, L., Kenney, W. L., O'Connor, F. G., & Roberts, W. O. (2017) · Journal of Athletic Training · doi:10.4085/1062-6050-52.9.02 · Cited by 438
Evaluation of specific gravity as normalization strategy for cattle urinary metabolome analysis
Jacob, C. C., Dervilly-Pinel, G., Biancotto, G., & Le Bizec, B. (2014) · Metabolomics · doi:10.1007/s11306-013-0604-z · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Chadha, V., Alon, U. S., & Garg, U.
- Venue
- Pediatric Nephrology
- Published
- 2001-04-12
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 374-382
- ISSN
- 0931-041X
- 1432-198X
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 1
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
