Validit�t des Mainzer Stadienmodells der Schmerzchronifizierung bei unterschiedlichen Schmerzdiagnosen
Abstract
Objective Our study was carried out to clarify whether differences in pain intensity,pain-related disability,depression and quality of life change with respect to the stage of chronicity of the Mainz Pain Staging Study (MPSS) in different pain syndromes. Keywords. Methods All patients with an initial pain clinic consultation from July 2000 to July 2001 and suffering from four major pain syndromes ("headache", "neuropathic pain", "back pain" or "muscle and joint pain") were included. Indicators of validity were several self-rating scales from the German pain questionnaire of the German Chapter of the International Association for the Study of Pain (DGSS). Patient data were collected using QUAST, a database environment specifically developed for documentation and quality assurance in pain therapy. An assessment was made for each of the four major diagnoses to determine whether patients in the three chronicity stages differed in their psychometric test results. In addition,the four diagnosis groups were tested for differences from one another. Results A total of 862 patient charts with documented pain syndromes and MPSS were extracted and analyzed. The extent of the subjective psychosocial stress and disability increased in all diagnosis groups and was correlated with the chronicity stage. The proportion of patients with an indication of clinically relevant depression (ADS score >23) increased with chronicity regardless of the pain diagnosis. The four main diagnosis groups diffe…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The severity of chronic pain depends on pain persistence, spreading of pain site, medication use, and health care utilization.
“The severity of chronic pain depended on pain persistence, spreading of pain site, medication use, and health care utilization.7”
From Adjustment to Chronic Pain in Back Pain Patients Classified According to the Motivational Stages of Chronic Pain Management (2006) · cites this paper as [7]
The severity of chronic pain demonstrated significant correlation with psychological impairment, depression, disability, and time off work.
“The severity of chronic pain demonstrated significant correlation with psychological impairment, depression, disability, and time off work.”
From Adjustment to Chronic Pain in Back Pain Patients Classified According to the Motivational Stages of Chronic Pain Management (2006) · cites this paper as [7]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 13 · Cited by 95
- Authors
- Frettl�h, J., Maier, C., Gockel, H., & H�ppe, M.
- Affiliations
- BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil Bochum (DE)
- University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (DE)
- Corresponding author
- H�ppe, M.
- Venue
- Der Schmerz
- Published
- 2003-08-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 240-251
- ISSN
- 0932-433X (ISSN-L)
- 1432-2129
- OpenAlex
- W288005113
- Cited by
- 95
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 0.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- de
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Der Schmerz (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
- Keywords
- chronic pain, validity, headache, neuropathic pain, back pain, musculoskeletal pain, pain-related disability, depression, quality of life, psychosocial stress, pain syndromes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review