ESIT – a digital twin of air surveillance infrastructure
Open accessAbstract
Civil air traffic surveillance and management depends heavily on the use of aircraft transponders replying to radio interrogations from cooperative surveillance systems such as secondary surveillance radars, multilateration and collision avoidance systems. A high number of such surveillance systems combined with a high aircraft density can cause a large quantity of interrogations, therefore having a detrimental impact on transponder behavior and sometimes even causing a loss of replies and thus a deterioration in aircraft surveillance. In order to ensure the safe operation of European air traffic management, the European Commission obligates the member states to take measures to ensure that the transponder load in their air spaces does not exceed a safe level. EUROCONTROL, in its function as network manager responsible for supporting the monitoring, management and coordination of the scarce spectrum resource, has contracted the implementation of a European simulation tool to Austro Control in collaboration with SeRo Systems and the Institute of Microwave and Photonic Engineering as subcontractors. This paper examines the development and use of this tool as well as the functionality it provides.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Schreiber et al. (2024) found that the ESIT tool improves surveillance and management of transponder loads.
“ESIT improves surveillance and management of transponder loads”
From Advancing civil infrastructure with digital twins: a review of applications and challenges (2025) · cites this paper as Schreiber et al. (2024)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Advancing civil infrastructure with digital twins: a review of applications and challenges
Kaveh, H., & Alhajj, R. (2025) · Journal of Civil Engineering and Management · doi:10.3846/jcem.2025.24921 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
- Authors
- Schreiber, H., Bösch, W., Paulitsch, H., Schlemmer, A., Schäfer, M., & Kraft, M.
- Affiliations
- Graz University of Technology (AT)
- Corresponding author
- Schreiber, Helmut
- Venue
- e+i Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik
- Published
- 2024-05-28
- Volume
- 141
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 175-187
- ISSN
- 0932-383X (ISSN-L)
- 1613-7620
- OpenAlex
- W4399089368
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 0.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- e+i Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Graz University of Technology
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Air Traffic Management and Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Radar Systems and Signal Processing
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Simulation and Modeling Applications
- Keywords
- digital twin, air traffic surveillance, aircraft transponders, secondary surveillance radar, multilateration, collision avoidance systems, air traffic management, spectrum management, simulation software
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review