Symptom clusters in patients with advanced cancers
Abstract
Goals of work It has been observed that certain cancer symptoms frequently occur together. Prior research on symptom patterns has focused mainly on inpatients, early stage cancers, or a single cancer type or metastatic site. Our aim was to explore symptom clusters among outpatients with different advanced cancers. Materials and methods Symptom scores by the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) were routinely collected for patients attending the Oncology Palliative Care Clinics at Princess Margaret Hospital from January 2005 to October 2007. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed for the entire patient cohort and within specific disease sites to determine inter-relationships of the nine ESAS symptoms. Main results A total of 1,366 patients was included: 682 (50%) were male and 684 (50%) were female. The median age was 64 years (range 18 to 74 years). The most common primary cancer sites were gastrointestinal (27%), lung (14%), and breast (11%). The three most distressful symptoms were fatigue, poor general well-being, and decreased appetite. PCA of symptoms for the entire patient cohort revealed two major symptom clusters: cluster 1 included fatigue, drowsiness, nausea, decreased appetite, and dyspnea, which accounted for 45% of the total variance; cluster 2 included anxiety and depression, which accounted for 10% of the total variance. There was high internal reliability in the clusters (Cronbach's alpha coefficient approximately 0.80). PCA of symptoms within th…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many people living with advanced cancer have symptoms of both depression and anxiety.
“many people living with advanced cancer have symptoms of both depression and anxiety (Cheung et al., 2009; Bender et al., 2005)”
From A mixed methods pilot and feasibility open trial of internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy (iCanADAPT Advanced) for people with advanced cancer with depression and/or anxiety (2021) · cites this paper as Cheung et al., 2009
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 43 · Cited by 166
- Authors
- Cheung, W. Y., Le, L. W., & Zimmermann, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Zimmermann, Camilla
- Venue
- Supportive Care in Cancer
- Published
- 2009-01-30
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1223-1230
- ISSN
- 0941-4355 (ISSN-L)
- 1433-7339
- OpenAlex
- W2043435158
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 15.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Supportive Care in Cancer (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Keywords
- symptom clusters, advanced cancer, palliative care, Edmonton Symptom Assessment System, fatigue, anxiety, depression, cancer-related fatigue, primary tumor site, symptom profiles, outpatients
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Ambulatory Care, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Ontario, Palliative Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Cluster Analysis, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review