The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Feasibility and validity of the Patient Neurotoxicity Questionnaire during taxane chemotherapy in a phase III randomized trial in patients with breast cancer: N-SAS BC 02
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., Bullinger, M., Cull, A., Duez, N. J., Filiberti, A., Flechtner, H., Fleishman, S. B., Haes, J. C. J. M. D., et al. (1993) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/85.5.365 · Cited by 16,005
Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit
Cohen, J. (1968) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0026256 · Cited by 8,736
The proof and measurement of association between two things
Spearman, C. (1904) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1412159 · Cited by 8,039
The functional assessment of cancer therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure
Cella, D. F., Tulsky, D. S., Gray, G., Sarafian, B., Linn, E., Bonomi, A., Silberman, M., Yellen, S. B., Winicour, P., & Brannon, J. (1993) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1993.11.3.570 · Cited by 6,020 · cited 1×
“several major cancer-specific HRQOL instruments such as the EORTC QOL-Core 30 (N=305) [1], FACT-G (N=545) [7], and the QOL Questionnaire for patients treated with Anti-Cancer Drugs (QOL-ACD) (N=212) [15].”
MethodQuality of Life: The Assessment, Analysis and Interpretation of Patient‐Reported Outcomes
Fayers, P. M., & Machin, D. (2007) · doi:10.1002/9780470024522 · Cited by 865
Basch, E., Iasonos, A., McDonough, T., Barz, A., Culkin, A., Kris, M. G., Scher, H. I., & Schrag, D. (2006) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(06)70910-x · Cited by 653
Fromme, E. K., Eilers, K. M., Mori, M., Hsieh, Y.-C., & Beer, T. M. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2004.03.025 · Cited by 555
Boehmke, M. M., & Dickerson, S. S. (2005) · Cancer Nursing · doi:10.1097/00002820-200509000-00008 · Cited by 141
Cited by
Cavaletti, G., Frigeni, B., Lanzani, F., Mattavelli, L., Susani, E., Alberti, P., Cortinovis, D., & Bidoli, P. (2010) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2009.12.008 · Cited by 274
Overview of neuropathy associated with taxanes for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer
Rivera, E., & Cianfrocca, M. (2015) · Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00280-014-2607-5 · Cited by 159
Metadata
- Authors
- Shimozuma, K., Ohashi, Y., Takeuchi, A., Aranishi, T., Morita, S., Kuroi, K., Ohsumi, S., Makino, H., Mukai, H., Katsumata, N., Sunada, Y., Watanabe, T., & Hausheer, F. H.
- Venue
- Supportive Care in Cancer
- Published
- 2009-03-28
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1483-1491
- ISSN
- 0941-4355 (ISSN-L)
- 1433-7339
- OpenAlex
- W2039494541
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 3.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Feasibility and validity of the Patient Neurotoxicity Questionnaire during taxane chemotherapy in a phase III randomized trial in patients with breast cancer: N-SAS BC 02. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00520-009-0613-7
- The paper
- Shimozuma, K., Ohashi, Y., Takeuchi, A., Aranishi, T., Morita, S., Kuroi, K., Ohsumi, S., Makino, H., Mukai, H., Katsumata, N., Sunada, Y., Watanabe, T., & Hausheer, F. H. (2009). Feasibility and validity of the Patient Neurotoxicity Questionnaire during taxane chemotherapy in a phase III randomized trial in patients with breast cancer: N-SAS BC 02. Supportive Care in Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-009-0613-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
