The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Implementing patient-centred cancer care: using experience-based co-design to improve patient experience in breast and lung cancer services
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this paper was to briefly describe how the experience-based co-design (EBCD) approach was used to identify and implement improvements in the experiences of breast and lung cancer patients before (1) comparing the issues identified as shaping patient experiences in the different tumour groups and (2) exploring participants' reflections on the value and key characteristics of this approach to improving patient experiences. METHODS: Fieldwork involved 36 filmed narrative patient interviews, 219 h of ethnographic observation, 63 staff interviews and a facilitated co-design change process involving patient and staff interviewees over a 12-month period. Four of the staff and five patients were interviewed about their views on the value of the approach and its key characteristics. The project setting was a large, inner-city cancer centre in England. RESULTS: Patients from both tumour groups generally identified similar issues (or 'touchpoints') that shaped their experience of care, although breast cancer patients identified a need for better information about side effects of treatment and end of treatment whereas lung cancer patients expressed a need for more information post-surgery. Although the issues were broadly similar, the particular improvement priorities patients and staff chose to work on together were tumour specific. Interviewees highlighted four characteristics of the EBCD approach as being key to its successful implementation: patient involvement, patient responsibility and empowerment, a sense of community, and a close connection between their experiences and the subsequent improvement priorities. CONCLUSION: EBCD positions patients as active partners with staff in quality improvement. Breast and lung cancer patients identified similar touchpoints in their experiences, but these were translated into different improvement priorities for each tumour type. This is an important consideration when developing patient-centred cancer services across different tumour types.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Effectiveness of strategies for informing, educating, and involving patients
Coulter, A., & Ellins, J. (2007) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39246.581169.80 · Cited by 1,128
The SAGE Handbook of Action Research
(2015) · doi:10.4135/9781473921290 · Cited by 848
Cited by
Patients and staff as codesigners of healthcare services
Robert, G., Cornwell, J., Locock, L., Purushotham, A., Sturmey, G., & Gager, M. (2015) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.g7714 · Cited by 427
Self-citationGleeson, H., Calderon, A., Swami, V., Deighton, J., Wolpert, M., & Edbrooke-Childs, J. (2016) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011907 · Cited by 287
Masterson, D., Areskoug Josefsson, K., Robert, G., Nylander, E., & Kjellström, S. (2022) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13470 · Cited by 281
Self-citationOn the Brink of Genuinely Collaborative Care: Experience-Based Co-Design in Mental Health
Larkin, M., Boden, Z. V. R., & Newton, E. (2015) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732315576494 · Cited by 158
Locock, L., Robert, G., Boaz, A., Vougioukalou, S., Shuldham, C., Fielden, J., Ziebland, S., Gager, M., Tollyfield, R., & Pearcey, J. (2014) · Health Services and Delivery Research · doi:10.3310/hsdr02040 · Cited by 138
Metadata
- Authors
- Tsianakas, V., Robert, G., Maben, J., Richardson, A., Dale, C., & Wiseman, T.
- Venue
- Supportive Care in Cancer
- Published
- 2012-04-29
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2639-2647
- ISSN
- 0941-4355 (ISSN-L)
- 1433-7339
- OpenAlex
- W2138493266
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Implementing patient-centred cancer care: using experience-based co-design to improve patient experience in breast and lung cancer services. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00520-012-1470-3
- The paper
- Tsianakas, V., Robert, G., Maben, J., Richardson, A., Dale, C., & Wiseman, T. (2012). Implementing patient-centred cancer care: using experience-based co-design to improve patient experience in breast and lung cancer services. Supportive Care in Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1470-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.