Cited by 211Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesCancer survivorship and carePalliative and Oncologic Care

A correlational study of suicidal ideation with psychological distress, depression, and demoralization in patients with cancer

Open access
Fang, Chun-Kai, Chang, Ming-Chih, Chen, Pei-Jan, Lin, Ching-Chi, Chen, Gon-Shen, Lin, Johnson, Hsieh, Ruey-Kuen, Chang, Yi-Fang +5 more·2014·Supportive Care in Cancer

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aims to study the effects of depression and demoralization on suicidal ideation and to determine the feasibility of the Distress Thermometer as a screening tool for patients with cancer who experience depression and demoralization, and thus to establish a model screening process for suicide prevention. METHODS: Purposive sampling was used to invite inpatients and outpatients with lung cancer, leukemia, and lymphoma. Two hundred participants completed the questionnaire, which included the Distress Thermometer (DT), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Demoralization Scale-Mandarin Version (DS-MV), and Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation. All data obtained were analyzed using SPSS 18.0 and SAS 9.3. RESULTS: Tobit regression analysis showed that demoralization influenced suicidal ideation more than depression did (t = 2.84, p < 0.01). When PHQ-9 ≥ 10 and DS-MV ≥42 were used as criteria for the DT, receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that the AUC values were 0.77-0.79, with optimal cutoff points for both of DT ≥5; sensitivity 76.9 and 80.6 %, respectively; and specificity of 73.9 and 72.2 %, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Demoralization had more influence on suicidal ideation than depression did. Therefore, attention should be paid to highly demoralized patients with cancer or high demoralization comorbid with depression for the purposes of suicide evaluation and prevention. The DT scale (with a cutoff of ≥5 points) has discriminative ability as a screening tool for demoralization or depression and can also be used in clinical settings for the preliminary screening of patients with cancer and high suicide risk.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00520-014-2290-4

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Psychological distress contributes to suicidal ideation via direct and indirect pathways; for the indirect pathway, depression and demoralization mediate the relationship.

    “Psychological distress contributes to suicidal ideation via direct and indirect pathways; for the latter, depression and demoralization mediate the relationship.38”

    From Prevalence and Correlates of Suicidal Ideation among Psycho-Oncology Outpatients (2024) · cites this paper as [38]

    The Results section’s Sobel mediation analysis supports an indirect relationship between psychological distress and suicidal ideation through depression and demoralization in patients with cancer. Table 2 shows an association between distress and suicidal ideation before accounting for those variables, but the adjusted distress association is not statistically significant. The claim therefore overstates the evidence for a direct pathway and omits the cancer-patient population. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 65 · Cited by 211

Authors
Fang, C.-K., Chang, M.-C., Chen, P.-J., Lin, C.-C., Chen, G.-S., Lin, J., Hsieh, R.-K., Chang, Y.-F., Chen, H.-W., Wu, C.-L., Lin, K.-C., Chiu, Y.-J., & Li, Y.-C.
Affiliations
  • Mackay Memorial Hospital (TW)
  • National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Science (TW)
Corresponding author
Li, Yu-Chan
Venue
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published
2014-06-17
Volume
22
Issue
12
Pages
3165-3174
ISSN
  • 0941-4355 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-7339
OpenAlex
W2169096462
Cited by
211
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
7.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Supportive Care in Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
Keywords
suicidal ideation, demoralization, depression, psychological distress, cancer patients, Distress Thermometer, suicide risk screening, suicide prevention, lung cancer, leukemia, lymphoma, PHQ-9
MeSH terms
Suicide Prevention, Adult, Aged, Depression, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Outpatients, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Socioeconomic Factors, Stress, Psychological, Suicide, Taiwan, Risk Assessment, Area Under Curve, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review