Cited by 97Gut microbiota and healthOral microbiology and periodontitis researchOral health in cancer treatment

Substantial decreases in the number and diversity of microbiota during chemotherapy-induced gastrointestinal mucositis in a rat model

Open access
Fijlstra, Margot, Ferdous, Mithila, Koning, Anne M., Rings, Edmond H. H. M., Harmsen, Hermie J. M., Tissing, Wim J. E.·2015·Supportive Care in Cancer

Abstract

Purpose Earlier, we showed in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients that the microbiota changes dramatically during anticancer treatment, coinciding with gastrointestinal mucositis: The commensal anaerobic populations reduce in favor of potential pathogens. Therefore, interventions targeting the microbiota during mucositis might be interesting but can better be tested in animals than in vulnerable mucositis patients. Here, we aimed to study the potential microbial changes during methotrexate (MTX)-induced gastrointestinal mucositis in a well-established rat model and to study whether this model can be used for future microbial intervention studies.Methods After injection with MTX or saline (day 0), rats were sacrificed between days 2 and 11. Plasma citrulline level, jejunal histology, and the number and diversity of intestinal bacteria in feces (using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)) were determined.Results Mucositis was most severe on day 4 when food intake, plasma citrulline, and villus length were the lowest, compared with controls (P < 0.0125). At the same time, MTX-treated rats showed an overall decrease (705-fold) in most bacteria (using a universal probe), compared with controls (P < 0.125). Reduced bacterial presence was related with the presence of diarrhea and a reduced villus length (rho = 0.38, P < 0.05). At day 4, there was an absolute and relative decrease of anaerobes (13-fold and -58 %, respectively) and streptococci (296-fold and -1 %, respectively) but a relative increase of Bacteroides (+49 %), compared with controls (P < 0.125).Conclusions In the mucositis rat model, we found substantial decreases in the number and diversity of microbiota, resembling earlier findings in humans. The model therefore seems well suited to study the effects of different microbial interventions on mucositis, prior to performing human studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00520-014-2487-6

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Methotrexate results in reduced microbiota diversity and compositional shifts in the abundance of Bacteroides associated with the induction of diarrhea in rats.

    “Methotrexate results in reduced microbiota diversity and compositional shifts in the abundance of Bacteroides associated with the induction of diarrhea in rats (Fijlstra et al., 2015).”

    From Gut reactions: Breaking down xenobiotic–microbiome interactions (2019) · cites this paper as Fijlstra et al., 2015

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 49 · Cited by 97

Authors
Fijlstra, M., Ferdous, M., Koning, A. M., Rings, E. H. H. M., Harmsen, H. J. M., & Tissing, W. J. E.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
  • Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
Corresponding author
Tissing, Wim J. E.
Venue
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published
2014-11-08
Volume
23
Issue
6
Pages
1513-1522
ISSN
  • 0941-4355 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-7339
OpenAlex
W2074693189
Cited by
97
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Supportive Care in Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Fonds NutsOhra
  • Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Oral health in cancer treatment
Keywords
gut microbiota, methotrexate, rat model, anaerobic bacteria, Bacteroides, Streptococcus, plasma citrulline, villous atrophy, diarrhea, acute myeloid leukemia, microbial interventions
MeSH terms
Animals, Citrulline, Intestinal Mucosa, Male, Methotrexate, Random Allocation, Rats, Wistar, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, Rats, Mucositis, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review