Substantial decreases in the number and diversity of microbiota during chemotherapy-induced gastrointestinal mucositis in a rat model
Open accessAbstract
Purpose Earlier, we showed in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients that the microbiota changes dramatically during anticancer treatment, coinciding with gastrointestinal mucositis: The commensal anaerobic populations reduce in favor of potential pathogens. Therefore, interventions targeting the microbiota during mucositis might be interesting but can better be tested in animals than in vulnerable mucositis patients. Here, we aimed to study the potential microbial changes during methotrexate (MTX)-induced gastrointestinal mucositis in a well-established rat model and to study whether this model can be used for future microbial intervention studies.Methods After injection with MTX or saline (day 0), rats were sacrificed between days 2 and 11. Plasma citrulline level, jejunal histology, and the number and diversity of intestinal bacteria in feces (using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)) were determined.Results Mucositis was most severe on day 4 when food intake, plasma citrulline, and villus length were the lowest, compared with controls (P < 0.0125). At the same time, MTX-treated rats showed an overall decrease (705-fold) in most bacteria (using a universal probe), compared with controls (P < 0.125). Reduced bacterial presence was related with the presence of diarrhea and a reduced villus length (rho = 0.38, P < 0.05). At day 4, there was an absolute and relative decrease of anaerobes (13-fold and -58 %, respectively) and streptococci (296-fold and -1 %, respectively) but a relative increase of Bacteroides (+49 %), compared with controls (P < 0.125).Conclusions In the mucositis rat model, we found substantial decreases in the number and diversity of microbiota, resembling earlier findings in humans. The model therefore seems well suited to study the effects of different microbial interventions on mucositis, prior to performing human studies.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Methotrexate results in reduced microbiota diversity and compositional shifts in the abundance of Bacteroides associated with the induction of diarrhea in rats.
“Methotrexate results in reduced microbiota diversity and compositional shifts in the abundance of Bacteroides associated with the induction of diarrhea in rats (Fijlstra et al., 2015).”
From Gut reactions: Breaking down xenobiotic–microbiome interactions (2019) · cites this paper as Fijlstra et al., 2015
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 49 · Cited by 97
- Authors
- Fijlstra, M., Ferdous, M., Koning, A. M., Rings, E. H. H. M., Harmsen, H. J. M., & Tissing, W. J. E.
- Affiliations
- University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
- Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Tissing, Wim J. E.
- Venue
- Supportive Care in Cancer
- Published
- 2014-11-08
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1513-1522
- ISSN
- 0941-4355 (ISSN-L)
- 1433-7339
- OpenAlex
- W2074693189
- Cited by
- 97
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4
- FWCI
- 2.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- pure.amsterdamumc.nl
- Licence
- other-oa
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Supportive Care in Cancer (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Fonds NutsOhra
- Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Oral health in cancer treatment
- Keywords
- gut microbiota, methotrexate, rat model, anaerobic bacteria, Bacteroides, Streptococcus, plasma citrulline, villous atrophy, diarrhea, acute myeloid leukemia, microbial interventions
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Citrulline, Intestinal Mucosa, Male, Methotrexate, Random Allocation, Rats, Wistar, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, Rats, Mucositis, Microbiota
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review