Cited by 123Cancer survivorship and careCardiovascular and exercise physiologyPhysical Activity and Health

Safety and feasibility of exercise interventions in patients with advanced cancer: a systematic review

Heywood, Reginald, McCarthy, Alexandra L., Skinner, Tina L.·2017·Supportive Care in Cancer

Abstract

Goals of work The beneficial effects of exercise in cancer patients are reasonably well-established, although research in this field has predominantly investigated cancer patients in the earlier stages of disease. However, the most recent evidence surrounding exercise interventions in advanced cancer populations has yet to be systematically evaluated. This review critically analyses the safety and feasibility of exercise interventions in patients with advanced cancer.Methods All randomised, non-randomised and prospective observational trials of exercise training interventions in patients with advanced cancer were included. 'Safety' was defined as the number and severity of reported adverse events during exercise training. 'Feasibility' was determined by participant adherence, attendance and/or study completion rates.Results A total of 25 studies involving 1088 patients were included: 16 randomised controlled and nine prospective observational cohort trials. Seven studies included advanced lung cancer patients exclusively, while eight involved patients with various cancer diagnoses. Aerobic exercise was investigated in five studies, resistance training in two studies and combination training (aerobic and resistance) in 14 studies. Six minor adverse events were reported due to exercise. All of these were musculoskeletal in nature, resulting in two participants' withdrawal from the study. Exercise adherence ranged from 65 to 89% but was only described in nine studies. Attendance at each exercise session was described in a further nine studies, ranging from 59 to 100%.Conclusions Implementation of exercise interventions appears to be safe and feasible in advanced cancer clinical practice, although targeted studies are required to determine the optimal exercise dose for specific cancer diagnoses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00520-017-3827-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 46 · Cited by 123

Authors
Heywood, R., McCarthy, A. L., & Skinner, T. L.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
Corresponding author
Heywood, Reginald
Venue
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published
2017-07-25
Volume
25
Issue
10
Pages
3031-3050
ISSN
  • 0941-4355 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-7339
OpenAlex
W2737156970
Cited by
123
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Supportive Care in Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
exercise intervention, advanced cancer, exercise safety, exercise feasibility, adverse events, exercise adherence, aerobic exercise, resistance training, concurrent training, lung cancer, cancer patients
MeSH terms
Exercise Therapy, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Exercise, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Exercise Tolerance, Disease Progression, Resistance Training, Observational Studies as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review