Cited by 105Cancer survivorship and careChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeEconomic and Financial Impacts of Cancer

Experiences of adult cancer survivors in transitions

Open access
Fitch, Margaret, Zomer, Sarah, Lockwood, Gina, Louzado, Cheryl, Shaw Moxam, Raquel, Rahal, Rami, Green, Esther·2019·Supportive Care in Cancer

Abstract

PURPOSE: To understand the experiences of adult cancer survivors as they transition from the end of cancer treatment to follow-up care as a basis for developing actionable recommendations to integrate cancer care delivery and survivorship care. METHODS: A national survey was conducted in collaboration with ten Canadian provinces to identify unmet needs and experiences with follow-up for cancer survivors between 1 and 3 years post-treatment. Surveys were available in English and French and completed either on paper or on-line. Samples were drawn from provincial cancer registries and packages distributed by mail. RESULTS: A total of 40,790 survey packages were mailed out across the ten provinces and 12,929 surveys were completed by adults (age 30+ years), and 329 surveys were completed by adolescents and young adults (age 18 to 29 years) giving an overall response rate of 33.3%. For the purposes of this publication, the focus will be on the adult sample. In the adult cohort (age 30+ years), 51% of the sample were females, 60% were 65 years of age or older, and 77% had not experienced metastatic spread. Three-quarters reported their health as good/very good and 82% that their quality of life was good/very good. Overall, 87% experienced at least one physical concern, 78% experienced at least one emotional concern, and 44% experienced at least one practical concern. The average number of concerns reported for each domain ranged from 2.0 to 3.8. For those who sought help, a third experienced difficulty obtaining assistance or did not receive it. The most frequently cited reasons for not seeking help was that someone had told them what they were experiencing was normal. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that many adult survivors have concerns about physical, emotional, and practical issues but are not receiving help to reduce their suffering. It is imperative we take action to correct this current reality.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00520-018-4605-3

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Participants reported a high prevalence of physical, emotional, practical, and information unmet care needs among BCSs.

    “Consistent with the literature [63], participants reported on the high prevalence of physical, emotional, practical, and information unmet care needs experienced by BCSs”

    From Development and Evaluation of the Usefulness, Usability, and Feasibility of iNNOV Breast Cancer: Mixed Methods Study (2022) · cites this paper as [63]

    The Results (Unmet need) report substantial unmet physical, emotional, and practical needs, while Results (Information availability) identify gaps in information about recurrence and community resources. But these are findings for a mixed adult cancer-survivor sample, not specifically breast cancer survivors (BCSs); Results (Sample-selected demographics) say breast cancer survivors made up 29% of respondents. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 24 · Cited by 105

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [10]Caroll-Johnson RM Gorman LM Bush Psychosocial nursing care among the cancer continuum (2nd Ed) 2006 Pittsburgh Oncology Nursing Press Inc

Authors
Fitch, M., Zomer, S., Lockwood, G., Louzado, C., Shaw Moxam, R., Rahal, R., & Green, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Canadian Partnership Against Cancer (CA)
Venue
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published
2018-12-26
Volume
27
Issue
8
Pages
2977-2986
ISSN
  • 0941-4355 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-7339
OpenAlex
W2905762333
Cited by
105
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 3
FWCI
3.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Supportive Care in Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TSpace (University of Toronto) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Partnership Against Cancer
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Keywords
cancer survivors, survivorship care, follow-up care, unmet needs, help-seeking barriers, physical concerns, emotional problems, practical problems, quality of life
MeSH terms
Transitional Care, Cancer Survivors, Adolescent, Aftercare, Aged, Canada, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Registries, Cohort Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review