Cited by 21Cancer survivorship and careMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility

Supporting colorectal cancer survivors using eHealth: a systematic review and framework suggestion

Ayyoubzadeh, Seyed Mohammad, R. Niakan Kalhori, Sharareh, Shirkhoda, Mohammad, Mohammadzadeh, Niloofar, Esmaeili, Marzieh·2020·Supportive Care in Cancer

Abstract

Purpose eHealth could potentially support colorectal cancer survivors; however, little is known regarding the overall recent eHealth systems for colorectal cancer survivors. The present study was conducted to address which types of eHealth supports have been provided to colorectal cancer survivors in the past two decades.Methods An electronic search was conducted in four databases including Scopus, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. The search query was based on two concepts: the first concept represented colorectal cancer and the second one comprised of information technology tools. The search was limited to 20 years (from 19 January 1999 to 19 January 2019). Obtained results were tabulated and represented as a framework.Results Fifteen papers were included in this systematic review. Information including intervention type, eHealth tools, main features of the system, and outcomes were extracted from selected papers. Obtained results were characterized using a four-layer framework. This framework included layers of hardware, software, service (educating the patient, medication intake, physical activity, health status monitoring, hospital visit reminder, and discussion group), and outcome. Outcome layer was composed of the following domains: quality of life, psychological and cognitive, physical activity, physical functioning, symptoms, engagement, and the outcome of the process and IT tools.Conclusion eHealth could provide useful services for supporting colorectal cancer survivors. Represented framework might be used for a better understanding of current technology and services provided to support these survivors. Also, this framework may be used as a basis for designing eHealth applications for colorectal cancer survivors after further validations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00520-020-05372-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 42 · Cited by 21

Authors
Ayyoubzadeh, S. M., R. Niakan Kalhori, S., Shirkhoda, M., Mohammadzadeh, N., & Esmaeili, M.
Affiliations
Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Venue
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published
2020-03-09
Volume
28
Issue
8
Pages
3543-3555
ISSN
  • 0941-4355 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-7339
OpenAlex
W3009920135
Cited by
21
References
42
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Supportive Care in Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Keywords
colorectal cancer survivors, e-health, digital health interventions, cancer survivorship support services, quality of life, physical activity, health status monitoring, medication adherence, online forums, patient education
MeSH terms
Cancer Survivors, Health Status, Humans, Palliative Care, Quality of Life, Colorectal Neoplasms, Exercise, Databases, Factual, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review