Resilience, preparedness, and distress among family caregivers of patients with advanced cancer
Open accessAbstract
Objective Resilience has been proposed as a primary factor in how many family caregivers of patients with advanced cancer are able to resist psychological strain and perform effectively in the role while bearing a high load of caregiving tasks. To evaluate this hypothesis, we examined whether self-perceived resilience is associated with distress (anxiety and depressive symptoms), caregiver preparedness, and readiness for surrogate decision-making among a racially diverse sample of family caregivers of patients with newly diagnosed advanced cancer. Methods Secondary analysis of baseline data from two small-scale, pilot clinical trials that both recruited family caregivers of patients with newly diagnosed advanced cancer. Using multivariable linear regression, we analyzed relationships of resilience as a predictor of mood, caregiving preparedness, and readiness for surrogate decision-making, controlling for sociodemographics. Results Caregiver participants (N = 112) were mean 56 years of age and mostly female (76%), the patient's spouse/partner (52%), and White (56%) or African-American/Black (43%). After controlling for demographics, standardized results indicated that higher resilience was relevantly associated with higher caregiver preparedness (beta = .46, p < .001), higher readiness for surrogate decision-making (beta = .20, p < .05) and lower anxiety (beta = - .19, p < .05), and depressive symptoms (beta = - .20, p < .05). Conclusions These results suggest that resilience may be critical to caregivers' abilities to manage stress, be effective sources of support to patients, and feel ready to make future medical decisions on behalf of patients. Future work should explore and clinicians should consider whether resilience can be enhanced in cancer caregivers to optimize their well-being and ability to perform in the caregiving and surrogate decision-making roles.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Resilience among many informal caregivers of patients with advanced cancer has been suggested as a primary component in their ability to withstand psychological strain and function effectively in the task despite carrying a heavy load of caregiving responsibilities.
“Resilience among many informal caregivers of patients with advanced cancer has been suggested as a primary component in their ability to withstand psychological strain and function effectively in the task despite carrying a heavy load of caregiving responsibilities [3, 7].”
From Preparedness, resilience and unmet needs of informal caregivers of advanced cancer patients in a Regional Mission Hospital in Kenya: Qualitative Study (2023) · cites this paper as [3]
Studies reported higher resilience associated with higher caregiver preparedness, higher readiness for surrogate decision-making, and lower anxiety and depressive symptoms.
“Whilst studies examining resiliency and preparedness of informal caregivers of advanced cancer patients reported higher resilience associated with higher caregiver preparedness, higher readiness for surrogate decision-making and lower anxiety and depressive symptoms [3, 8, 9]”
From Preparedness, resilience and unmet needs of informal caregivers of advanced cancer patients in a Regional Mission Hospital in Kenya: Qualitative Study (2023) · cites this paper as [3]
Resilience may be critical to informal caregivers' abilities to manage stress, be effective sources of support to patients, and feel ready to make future medical decisions on behalf of patients.
“studies have shown that resilience may be critical to informal caregivers' abilities to manage stress, be effective sources of support to patients, and feel ready to make future medical decisions on behalf of patients [3, 7].”
From Preparedness, resilience and unmet needs of informal caregivers of advanced cancer patients in a Regional Mission Hospital in Kenya: Qualitative Study (2023) · cites this paper as [3]
Caregiving must be balanced against pre-existing roles and duties.
“In addition, caregiving must be balanced against pre-existing roles and duties [3].”
From Preparedness, resilience and unmet needs of informal caregivers of advanced cancer patients in a Regional Mission Hospital in Kenya: Qualitative Study (2023) · cites this paper as [3]
The Introduction describes substantial caregiving demands, and the Discussion describes a rapid accumulation of new tasks for family members. Neither passage addresses balancing caregiving against pre-existing roles or duties; searches for competing responsibilities and existing roles found no such passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn other studies, role strain correlates to the number of other competing roles, which in turn is determined by the stage of lifespan that a caregiver was in.
“In other studies, role strain correlates to the number of other competing roles, which in turn is determined by the stage of lifespan that a caregiver was in [1, 3]”
From Preparedness, resilience and unmet needs of informal caregivers of advanced cancer patients in a Regional Mission Hospital in Kenya: Qualitative Study (2023) · cites this paper as [3]
The Introduction and Discussion describe numerous caregiving tasks and stressors, but do not relate role strain to the number of competing roles or relate those roles to a caregiver’s life stage. Searches for “role strain” and “lifespan life stage competing roles” found no passage making that connection; the only exact mention of “role strain” was in a reference title. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 47 · Cited by 89
Research works printed but not linked: 32
- [1]Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2019) Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin 69(1): 7– 34 30620402
- [3]Yabroff KR, Kim Y (2009) Time costs associated with informal caregiving for cancer survivors. Cancer 115(18 Suppl): 4362– 4373 19731345
- [4]Geng HM, Chuang DM, Yang F (2018) Prevalence and determinants of depression in caregivers of cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 97(39): e11863 30278483 PMC6181540
- [5]Nielsen MK, Neergaard MA, Jensen AB, Bro F, Guldin MB (2016) Psychological distress, health, and socio-economic factors in caregivers of terminally ill patients: a nationwide population-based cohort study. Support Care Cancer 24(7): 3057– 3067 26887588
- [6]Wendler D, Rid A (2011) Systematic review: the effect on surrogates of making treatment decisions for others. Ann Intern Med 154(5): 336– 346 21357911
- [7]Palacio C, Krikorian A, Gomez-Romero M, Limonero J (2020) Resilience in caregivers: a systematic review. Am J Hosp Palliat Med 37(8): 648– 658 31830813
- [8]Petriwskyj A, Parker D, O’Dwyer S, Moyle W, Nucifora N (2016) Interventions to build resilience in family caregivers of people living with dementia: a comprehensive systematic review. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep 14(6): 238– 273 27532659
- [11]Denckla CA, Cicchetti D, Kubzansky LD (2020) Psychological resilience: an update on definitions, a critical appraisal, and research recommendations. Eur J Psychotraumatol 11(1): 1822064 33244362 PMC7678676
- [13]Ungar M, Theron L (2020) Resilience and mental health: how multisystemic processes contribute to positive outcomes. Lancet Psychiatry 7(5): 441– 448 31806473
- [15]Cervone D (2004) The architecture of personality. Psychol Rev 111(1): 183– 204 14756593
- [16]Lazarus R, Folkman S (1984) Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer Publishing Company, New York
- [17]Campbell-Sills L, Stein MB (2007) Psychometric analysis and refinement of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC): validation of a 10-item measure of resilience. J Trauma Stress 20(6): 1019– 1028 18157881
- [19]Bickel KE, Levy C, MacPhee ER (2020) An integrative framework of appraisal and adaptation in serious medical illness. J Pain Symptom Manage 60(3): 657– 677.e656 32446974 PMC7483912
- [20]Roth S, Cohen LJ (1986) Approach, avoidance, and coping with stress. Am Psychol 41(7): 813– 819 3740641
- [21]Lerner JS, Li Y, Valdesolo P, Kassam KS (2015) Emotion and decision making. Annu Rev Psychol 66: 799– 823 25251484
- [22]Power TE, Swartzman LC, Robinson JW (2011) Cognitive-emotional decision making (CEDM): a framework of patient medical decision making. Patient Educ Couns 83(2): 163– 169 20573468
- [23]Hendricks BA, Lofton C, Azuero A (2019) The project ENABLE Cornerstone randomized pilot trial: protocol for lay navigator-led early palliative care for African-American and rural advanced cancer family caregivers. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 16: 100485 31768470 PMC6872851
- [25]Archbold PG, Stewart BJ, Greenlick MR, Harvath T (1990) Mutuality and preparedness as predictors of caregiver role strain. Res Nurs Health 13(6): 375– 384 2270302
- [26]Dionne-Odom JN, Demark-Wahnefried W, Taylor RA, The self-care practices of family caregivers of persons with poor prognosis cancer: differences by varying levels of caregiver well-being and preparedness. Support Care Cancer. 2017. PMC5481472 28247128
- [27]Nolan MT, Hughes MT, Kub J (2009) Development and validation of the Family Decision-Making Self-Efficacy Scale. Palliat Support Care 7(3): 315– 321 19788773 PMC2814174
- [30]Harrell F (2015) Regression modeling strategies with applications to linear models, logistic and ordinal regression, and survival analysis, 2nd edn. Springer, New York, NY
- [31]Palacio C, Krikorian A, Limonero JT (2018) The influence of psychological factors on the burden of caregivers of patients with advanced cancer: resiliency and caregiver burden. Palliat Support Care 16(3): 269– 277 28464972
- [32]Sarlija M, Popovic S, Jagodic M, Prediction of task performance from physiological features of stress resilience. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2020;PP. 33253118
- [33]Beckstead JW (2012) Isolating and examining sources of suppression and multicollinearity in multiple linear regression. Multivariate Behav Res 47(2): 224– 246 26734849
- [34]Devnani R, Slaven JE, Bosslet GT (2017) How surrogates decide: a secondary data analysis of decision-making principles used by the surrogates of hospitalized older adults. J Gen Intern Med 32(12): 1285– 1293 28840485 PMC5698224
- [36]Feudtner C, Schall T, Hill D (2018) Parental personal sense of duty as a foundation of pediatric medical decision-making. Pediatrics 142(Suppl 3): S133– S141 30385619
- [37]Kent EE, Rowland JH, Northouse L (2016) Caring for caregivers and patients: research and clinical priorities for informal cancer caregiving. Cancer 122(13): 1987– 1995 26991807 PMC5597246
- [39]Dias R, Santos RL, Sousa MF (2015) Resilience of caregivers of people with dementia: a systematic review of biological and psychosocial determinants. Trends Psychiatry Psychother 37(1): 12– 19 25860562
- [41]Ejem D, Bauldry S, Bakitas M, Drentea P (2018) Caregiver burden, care recipient depressive symptomology, and social exchange: does race matter? J Palliat Care 33(2): 100– 108 29514553 PMC5964993
- [42]Ferrell BR, Temel JS, Temin S (2017) Integration of palliative care into standard oncology care: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline update. J Clin Oncol 35(1): 96– 112 28034065
- [43]Rosenberg AR, Dussel V, Kang T (2013) Psychological distress in parents of children with advanced cancer. JAMA Pediatr 167(6): 537– 543 23545569 PMC4263253
- [45]Rosenberg AR, Yi-Frazier JP (2016) Commentary: Resilience defined: an alternative perspective. J Pediatr Psychol 41(5): 506– 509 27013701 PMC4888119
- Authors
- Dionne-Odom, J. N., Azuero, A., Taylor, R. A., Wells, R. D., Hendricks, B. A., Bechthold, A. C., Reed, R. D., Harrell, E. R., Dosse, C. K., Engler, S., McKie, P., Ejem, D., Bakitas, M. A., & Rosenberg, A. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
- University of Alabama (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dionne-Odom, J. Nicholas
- ORCID
- Venue
- Supportive Care in Cancer
- Published
- 2021-05-24
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 6913-6920
- ISSN
- 0941-4355 (ISSN-L)
- 1433-7339
- PMC
- PMC9733586
- OpenAlex
- W3165805817
- Cited by
- 89
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 7
- FWCI
- 19.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Supportive Care in Cancer (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Nursing Research (R00NR015903)
- National Palliative Care Research Center (No grant number)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Keywords
- resilience, family caregivers, advanced cancer, caregiver preparedness, surrogate decision-making, caregiver distress, anxiety, depressive symptoms, psychological strain, newly diagnosed cancer, racial diversity
- MeSH terms
- Anxiety, Emotions, Family, Female, Humans, Male, Neoplasms, Stress, Psychological, Caregivers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review