Acceptance- and mindfulness-based techniques for physical activity promotion in breast cancer survivors: a qualitative study
Open accessAbstract
Purpose The purpose of this study was to develop and characterize the relevance and potential utility of an electronically delivered acceptance- and mindfulness-based approaches to physical activity promotion for insufficiently active breast cancer survivors.Methods The acceptance- and mindfulness-based physical activity intervention was delivered to participants electronically over the course of 4-8 weeks. It consisted of didactic videos, experiential exercises, and workbook-type activities that targeted principles from acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT). We conducted semi-structured, in-depth interviews with participants after they completed the intervention. Three coders conducted qualitative data analysis on interview transcripts to identify overarching themes and subthemes.Results We recruited 30 participants. Of those, 16 engaged in an individual interview. The mean age of the sample was 58.4 years (SD = 13.8). The sample was relatively well educated (50.0% college graduates) and mostly overweight or obese (58.8%). We identified two overarching themes from interviews. They were centered on (1) internal and external barriers to physical activity adherence and (2) the utility of targeting core ACT processes (acceptance and defusion, mindfulness, and values clarification) for physical activity promotion.Conclusion Intervention content was perceived to be acceptable, relevant, and to fulfill important needs related to healthy living. Findings suggest that this approach to physical activity promotion can be delivered effectively online. Electronically delivered acceptance- and mindfulness-based approaches hold promise for helping insufficiently active breast cancer survivors increase physical activity.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ACT-informed PiPT has demonstrated improvement for back-related disability, function, and pain interference, addressed barriers for engagement in physical activity, and patients report greater internal awareness that their whole being was not defined by their pain experience.
“ACT informed PiPT has demonstrated improvement for back-related disability, function, and pain-interference, addressed barriers for engagement in physical activity, and patients report the program supports greater internal awareness that their whole being was not defined by their pain experience.22,36,44,46”
From Remotely Delivered Psychologically Informed Mindful Movement Physical Therapy for Pain Care: A Framework for Operationalization (2023) · cites this paper as [46]
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 29 · Cited by 9
- Authors
- Robertson, M. C., Cox-Martin, E., Liao, Y., Flores, S. A., Shegog, R., Markham, C. M., Fujimoto, K., Durand, C. P., Brewster, A., Lyons, E. J., & Basen-Engquist, K. M.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System (US)
- The University of Texas at Arlington (US)
- Texas A&M University (US)
- The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US)
- Corresponding author
- Robertson, Michael C.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Supportive Care in Cancer
- Published
- 2021-07-27
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 465-473
- ISSN
- 0941-4355 (ISSN-L)
- 1433-7339
- PMC
- PMC8314027
- OpenAlex
- W3183196777
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4
- FWCI
- 0.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Supportive Care in Cancer (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Digital Commons-TMC (Texas Medical Center) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (F31 CA236433, P30 CA016672)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Keywords
- breast cancer survivors, physical activity promotion, acceptance and commitment therapy, mindfulness, electronic interventions, acceptability, values clarification, defusion, intervention development
- MeSH terms
- Cancer Survivors, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Exercise, Mindfulness, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review