Cited by 20Cancer survivorship and careChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeWomen's cancer prevention and management

Assessing the fear of recurrence using the Cancer Worry Scale in a sample of Italian breast cancer survivors

Chirico, Andrea, Vizza, Deborah, Valente, Moira, Iacono, Melania Lo, Campagna, Maria Rosita, Palombi, Tommaso, Alivernini, Fabio, Lucidi, Fabio +1 more·2022·Supportive Care in Cancer

Abstract

Purpose The fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is one of the most reported problems by cancer survivors. A valid instrument to detect this issue could be useful to identify cancer survivors who are more vulnerable to developing FCR and related adverse outcomes (e.g., anxiety). The present study aimed to evaluate FCR in a sample of Italian breast cancer survivors using an Italian version of the 8-item Cancer Worry Scale (CWS) in order to establish a cut-off for the use in clinical settings. Methods The participants were 119 breast cancer survivors (mean age 47.7 years) at least 1 year after their primary treatment. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of CWS, internal reliability of CWS, concurrent and divergent validity using a bivariate correlation between the key measures of the study (i.e., FCR, anxiety, depression, fatigue, and self-efficacy), and ROC analysis of CWS were performed. Results Fit indices for the EFA were considered acceptable and showed a two-factor structure-labeled cancer worries and worries impact. The reliability of the two factors showed a Cronbach's alpha coefficient greater than 0.90. The CWS was positively related to anxiety, depression, fatigue, and negatively related to perceived self-efficacy. The best cut-off score was 24 versus 25, with a sensitivity of 74% and a specificity of 85%. Conclusions The CWS is a valid questionnaire to assess FCR among breast cancer survivors. The present study provides an overview of the relationship between CWS and th…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00520-021-06718-4

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chirico, A., Vizza, D., Valente, M., Iacono, M. L., Campagna, M. R., Palombi, T., Alivernini, F., Lucidi, F., & Bruno, F.
Affiliations
Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Corresponding author
Bruno, Francesco
Venue
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published
2021-11-30
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
2829-2837
ISSN
  • 0941-4355 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-7339
OpenAlex
W3214854566
Cited by
20
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3
FWCI
0.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Supportive Care in Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
Keywords
fear of cancer recurrence, breast cancer survivors, Italian adaptation, psychometric validation, anxiety, depression, fatigue, self-efficacy, cut-off values, questionnaire reliability and validity
MeSH terms
Cancer Survivors, Anxiety, Breast Neoplasms, Fear, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review