Cited by 9Cancer survivorship and careDigital Mental Health InterventionsTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

An examination of depression, anxiety, and fear of recurrence among cancer survivors who participated in a virtual cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)-based telephone coaching program

Nguyen, Patricia, Heisey, Ruth, Quenneville, Camille, Goulbourne, Elaine, Khan, Rumaisa, Rinaldo, Emma, Chagigiorgis, Helen, Shields, Rebecca +1 more·2022·Supportive Care in Cancer

Abstract

Background Depression, anxiety, and fear of recurrence (FOR) are prevalent among cancer survivors, and it is recommended that they have access to supportive services and resources to address psychosocial needs during follow-up care. This study examined the impact of a virtual cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)-based telephone coaching program (BounceBack®) on depression, anxiety, and FOR. Method Through the After Cancer Treatment Transition (ACTT) clinic at the Women's College Hospital (Toronto, Canada), eligible participants were identified, consented, and referred to the BounceBack® program. Program participation involved completion of self-selected online workbooks and support from trained telephone coaches. Measures of depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7), and FOR (fear of cancer recurrence inventory, FCRI) were collected at pre-intervention (baseline) and post-intervention (6-month and 12-month time points). For each psychosocial measure, paired t-tests compared mean scores between study time points. Participant experiences and perceptions were collected through a survey. Results Measures of depression and anxiety significantly improved among participants from pre-intervention to post-intervention. Scores for PHQ-9 and GAD-7 decreased from moderate to mild levels. Measure of FOR also significantly improved, while FCRI sub-scale scores significantly improved for 5 of the 7 factors that characterize FOR (triggers, severity, psychological distress, functional impairment, ins…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00520-022-07148-6

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nguyen, P., Heisey, R., Quenneville, C., Goulbourne, E., Khan, R., Rinaldo, E., Chagigiorgis, H., Shields, R., & Townsley, C.
Affiliations
  • Women's College Hospital (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Canadian Mental Health Association (CA)
Corresponding author
Nguyen, Patricia
Venue
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published
2022-05-24
Volume
30
Issue
9
Pages
7323-7332
ISSN
  • 0941-4355 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-7339
OpenAlex
W4281387811
Cited by
9
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2
FWCI
0.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Supportive Care in Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
cancer survivors, depression, anxiety, fear of recurrence, cognitive behavioral therapy, telephone coaching, virtual intervention, psychosocial support, intervention satisfaction
MeSH terms
Mentoring, Cancer Survivors, Anxiety, Depression, Fear, Female, Humans, Neoplasms, Telephone, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review