Cited by 8Stoma care and complicationsNursing care and researchFamily Caregiving in Mental Illness

Caregiver experiences of caring for family members with urostomy: a qualitative study

Open access
Han, Xiaojuan, Gao, Kaixia, Shang, Linping, Wei, Liang·2024·Supportive Care in Cancer

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Objective In China, bladder tumors rank first for morbidity and mortality among urological and reproductive system tumors. Total radical cystectomy plus urinary flow conversion is the gold standard for the treatment of muscle-layer invasive bladder cancer. With an increasing number of radical cystectomies each year, the number of patients living with urostomy is growing. After discharge, primary care of urostomy patients is given at home, and high demands are placed on home caregivers due to issues of privacy and the complexity of replacing the urostomy device. This research explored the challenges faced by the family caregivers of urostomy patients. Methods We used descriptive qualitative research methods to conduct interviews with twenty-five family caregivers of patients with urostomy. Survey subjects were from five general hospitals. All interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis. Results Three critical challenges were identified-confusion, family crisis, and struggle psychology. Within these three themes, six sub-themes were constructed by coders. They were knowledge and skill deficiency, strong insecurities and uncertainties, role conflict, economic burden, emotional overwhelmed and calm acceptance. Conclusion Family caregivers play a critical role in patient care, and especially in urostomy care. Caregiving is associated with significant challenges that hinder the family caregiver's ability to effectively care for the patient, further diminishing the caregiver's quality of life. Therefore, healthcare professionals should consider the challenges faced by family caregivers and take measures to obviate them through education, preparation, and support.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00520-024-08376-8

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Without access to formal caregiving services or institutional support, family caregivers shouldered multiple roles alone, heightening the risk of burnout and occupational strain.

    “Without access to formal caregiving services or institutional support, these multiple roles were shouldered alone, heightening the risk of burnout and occupational strain.”

    From The burdens, coping strategies, and unmet needs of family caregivers of Chinese patients with lymphoma receiving commercial CAR-T-cell therapy: A qualitative study (2026) · cites this paper as [53]

    The Role conflict and Family crisis sections (page unavailable) describe caregivers juggling multiple roles, serious disruption to work, and some having to resign or change jobs. Knowledge and skill deficiency reports little professional guidance after discharge, but the paper does not establish that caregivers lacked access to formal services or institutional support, shouldered their roles alone, or faced a specifically identified risk of burnout. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 38 · Cited by 8

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Saginala K, Barsouk A, Aluru J S, et al. Epidemiology of bladder cancer[J]. Medical sciences, 2020, 8(1): 15.
  2. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians, 2018, 68(6): 394-424.
  3. Han S J, Zhang S W, Chen W Q, et al. Analysis of the status and trends of bladder cancer incidence in China[J]. Oncology Process, 2013, 11: 89-95.
  4. Li H Z, Zheng R S, Du L B, et al. Bladder cancer incidence, mortality and temporal trends in China[J]. Zhonghua Zhong liu za zhi [Chinese Journal of Oncology], 2021, 43(3): 293-298.
  5. Ledón Llanes L. Enfermedades crónicas y vida cotidiana[J]. Revista cubana de salud pública, 2011, 37: 488-499.
  6. Trevino K M, Maciejewski P K, Shen M J, et al. How much time is left? Associations between estimations of patient life expectancy and quality of life in patients and caregivers[J]. Supportive Care in Cancer, 2019, 27(7): 2487-2496.
  7. Kirkland-Kyhn H, Martin S, Zaratkiewicz S, et al. Ostomy care at home[J]. AJN The American Journal of Nursing, 2018, 118(4): 63-68.
  8. Ju Hongjie, Yin Anchun, Liu Wei. Research progress of negative psychological state and nursing in patients with urostomy [J]. Nursing practice and research,2021,18(18):2717-2720.
  9. Rosland A M, Heisler M, Piette J D. The impact of family behaviors and communication patterns on chronic illness outcomes: a systematic review[J]. Journal of behavioral medicine, 2012, 35(2): 221-239.
  10. Hedgepeth R C, Gilbert S M, He C, et al. Body image and bladder cancer speci c quality of life in patients with ileal conduit and neobladder urinary diversions[J]. Urology, 2010, 76(3): 671-675.
  11. Cerruto M A, D'Elia C, Cacciamani G, et al. Behavioural pro le and human adaptation of survivors after radical cystectomy and ileal conduit[J]. Health and quality of life outcomes, 2014, 12(1): 1-7.
  12. Bhanvadia S K. Bladder cancer survivorship[J]. Current urology reports, 2018, 19(12): 1-8.
  13. Trevino K M, Maciejewski P K, Shen M J, et al. How much time is left? Associations between estimations of patient life expectancy and quality of life in patients and caregivers[J]. Supportive Care in Cancer, 2019, 27(7): 2487-2496.
  14. Vaismoradi M, Turunen H, Bondas T. Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study[J]. Nursing & health sciences, 2013, 15(3): 398-405.
  15. Kristanti M S, Setiyarini S, Effendy C. Enhancing the quality of life for palliative care cancer patients in Indonesia through family caregivers: a pilot study of basic skills training[J]. BMC palliative care, 2017, 16(1): 1-7.
  16. Al C M W, Stams G J J M, van der Laan P H, et al. The role of crisis in family crisis intervention: Do crisis experience and crisis change matter?[J]. Children and Youth Services Review, 2011, 33(6): 991-998.
  17. Liu Qianqian, Tian Li, Tian Jie, Zhang Li. Study on caregiving ability and in uencing factors of caregivers of patients with urostomy [J]. Journal of nursing administration,2021,21(06):397-401.
  18. Villa G, Mannarini M, Della Giovanna G, et al. A literature review about self-care on ostomy patients and their caregivers[J]. International Journal of Urological Nursing, 2019, 13(2): 75-80.
  19. Given B A, Given C W, Sherwood P. The challenge of quality cancer care for family caregivers[C]//Seminars in oncology nursing. WB Saunders, 2012, 28(4): 205-212.
  20. Kilic S T, Oz F. Family caregivers' involvement in caring with cancer and their quality of life[J]. Asian Paci c Journal of Cancer Prevention: APJCP, 2019, 20(6): 1735.
  21. Dionne-Odom J N, Hull J G, Martin M Y, et al. Associations between advanced cancer patients' survival and family caregiver presence and burden[J]. Cancer medicine, 2016, 5(5): 853-862.
  22. Kang J, Shin D W, Choi J E, et al. Factors associated with positive consequences of serving as a family caregiver for a terminal cancer patient[J]. Psycho-Oncology, 2013, 22(3): 564-571.
  23. Given B A, Given C W, Kozachik S. Family support in advanced cancer[J]. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians, 2001, 51(4): 213-231.
  24. Apostolou M, Wang Y. In-law preferences in China: What parents look for in the parents of their children's mates[J]. Evolutionary Psychology, 2017, 15(3): 1474704917723913.
  25. Pan H.Y., Chen M.F. & Wu S.X. (2000) Survey on the health information needs of cancer patients' families. Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing 16, 57-58.
  26. Rabow M., Hauser J. & Adams J. (2004) Supporting family caregivers at the end of life: 'They don't know what they don't know'. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 291, 483-491.
  27. Nemati S, Rassouli M, Baghestani A R. The spiritual challenges faced by family caregivers of patients with cancer: A qualitative study[J]. Holistic nursing practice, 2017, 31(2): 110-117.
  28. Kirkland-Kyhn H, Martin S, Zaratkiewicz S, et al. Ostomy care at home[J]. AJN The American Journal of Nursing, 2018, 118(4): 63-68.
  29. Nemati S, Rassouli M, Ilkhani M, et al. Perceptions of family caregivers of cancer patients about the challenges of caregiving: a qualitative study[J]. Scandinavian journal of caring sciences, 2018, 32(1): 309- 316.
  30. Rabiei L, Eslami A A, Abedi H A, et al. Caring in an atmosphere of uncertainty: perspectives and experiences of caregivers of peoples undergoing haemodialysis in Iran[J]. Scandinavian journal of caring sciences, 2016, 30(3): 594-601.
  31. Littlejohn R L. Confucianism: an introduction[M]. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2010.
  32. Otis-Green S, Juarez G. Enhancing the social well-being of family caregivers[C]//Seminars in oncology nursing. WB Saunders, 2012, 28(4): 246-255.
  33. Northouse L L, Katapodi M C, Schafenacker A M, et al. The impact of caregiving on the psychological well- being of family caregivers and cancer patients[C]//Seminars in oncology nursing. WB Saunders, 2012, 28(4): 236-245.
  34. Borwell B. Rehabilitation and stoma care: addressing the psychological needs[J]. British Journal of Nursing, 2009, 18(Sup1): S20-25.

Authors
Han, X., Gao, K., Shang, L., & Wei, L.
Affiliations
  • Shanxi Medical University (CN)
  • First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
Shang, Linping
Venue
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published
2024-02-19
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
167-167
ISSN
  • 0941-4355 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-7339
OpenAlex
W4391943005
Cited by
8
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2
FWCI
3.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Supportive Care in Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Shanxi Province Basic Research Program (Shanxi Province Basic Research Program)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Stoma care and complications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
Keywords
urostomy, family caregivers, caregiver experiences, home care, bladder cancer, radical cystectomy, urinary diversion, caregiver burden, role conflict, economic burden, caregiver knowledge and skills, caregiver support, quality of life
MeSH terms
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms, Emotions, Family, Humans, Quality of Life, Caregivers, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review