The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Decision tree classifiers for automated medical diagnosis
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Physicians frequently use decision trees as tools; however, they are effectively tied to the initial tree structure and thus somewhat static (8).”
From Accessing Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Decision-Making (2021) · cites this paper as [8]
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine
Friedman, J. H. (2001) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1013203451 · Cited by 30,731
UCI Machine Learning Repository
Asuncion, A. (2007) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 24,190
Classification and Regression Trees.
Gordon, A. D., Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., & Stone, C. J. (1984) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2530946 · Cited by 23,867
(1992) · Cited by 23,431
Artificial intelligence: a modern approach
Kumar, D. A., Balasubramanian, S., Byeon, D. H., & Manerkar, P. G. V. (1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-1577 · Cited by 22,191
Classification and Regression Trees.
Ryzin, J. V., Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., & Stone, C. J. (1986) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288003 · Cited by 21,030
Breiman, L. (1996) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00058655 · Cited by 16,325
Artificial intelligence: A modern approach
Nilsson, N. J. (1996) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(96)00007-0 · Cited by 10,730
Experiments with a new boosting algorithm
Freund, Y., & Schapire, R. E. (1996) · Cited by 8,189
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Endo A, Shibata T, Tanaka H (2008) Comparison of seven algorithms to predict breast cancer survival. Biomed Soft Comput Hum Sci 13(2):11–16
- Ho T (1995) Random decision forest. In: 3rd international conference on document analysis and recognition, Montreal, Canada, August 14–18, 1995, pp 278–282
- Shanthi S, Bhaskaran VM (2011) Intuitionistic fuzzy C-means and decision tree approach for breast cancer detection and classification. Eur J Sci Res 66(3):345–351
- Theodoridis S, Koutroumbas K (2006) Pattern recognition, 3rd edn. Academic Press, San Diego
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Yassin, N. I. R., Omran, S., Houby, E. M. F. E., & Allam, H. (2017) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2017.12.012 · Cited by 399
Breast Cancer Prediction: A Comparative Study Using Machine Learning Techniques
Islam, M. M., Haque, M. R., Iqbal, H., Hasan, M. M., Hasan, M., & Kabir, M. N. (2020) · SN Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s42979-020-00305-w · Cited by 375
Shaikhina, T., Lowe, D., Daga, S., Briggs, D., Higgins, R. M., & Khovanova, N. A. (2017) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2017.01.012 · Cited by 370
Accessing Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Decision-Making
Giordano, C., Brennan, M., Mohamed, B., Rashidi, P., Modave, F., & Tighe, P. (2021) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2021.645232 · Cited by 326
Radiological images and machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects
Zhang, Z., & Sejdić, E. (2019) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.02.017 · Cited by 249
Metadata
- Authors
- Azar, A. T., & El-Metwally, S. M.
- Affiliations
- Misr University for Science and Technology (EG)
- Cairo University (EG)
- Corresponding author
- Azar, Ahmad Taher
- Venue
- Neural Computing and Applications
- Published
- 2012-10-07
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 7-8
- Pages
- 2387-2403
- ISSN
- 0941-0643 (ISSN-L)
- 1433-3058
- OpenAlex
- W1982067074
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 86
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 5.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Neural Computing and Applications (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Mining and Machine Learning Applications
- Keywords
- breast cancer detection, decision tree classification, boosted decision trees, decision tree forest, clinical decision support systems, automated medical diagnosis, Wisconsin Breast Cancer dataset, classifier comparison
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
