Cited by 128Artificial Intelligence in HealthcareAI in cancer detectionEndometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments

Application of machine learning to predict the recurrence-proneness for cervical cancer

Tseng, Chih-Jen, Lu, Chi-Jie, Chang, Chi-Chang, Chen, Gin-Den·2014·Neural Computing and Applications

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00521-013-1359-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 128

Authors
Tseng, C.-J., Lu, C.-J., Chang, C.-C., & Chen, G.-D.
Affiliations
  • Chung Shan Medical University Hospital (TW)
  • Chien Hsin University of Science and Technology (TW)
Corresponding author
Chang, Chi-Chang
Venue
Neural Computing and Applications
Published
2013-02-14
Volume
24
Issue
6
Pages
1311-1316
ISSN
  • 0941-0643 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-3058
OpenAlex
W2014510428
Cited by
128
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
2.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Neural Computing and Applications (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Keywords
cervical cancer, recurrence prediction, prognostic factors, risk factors, C5.0 decision tree, support vector machine, extreme learning machine, pathological stage, cell types, radiotherapy target, adjuvant therapy, cancer registry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review