Vibrotactile perception: examining the coding of vibrations and the just noticeable difference under various conditions
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The just-noticeable difference of vibration frequencies is between 18% and 20%.
“the just-noticeable difference of vibration frequencies (i.e. the lowest frequency difference to perceive a change in vibration) is between 18% and 20% [34]”
From Eyes-Off Your Fingers: Gradual Surface Haptic Feedback Improves Eyes-Free Touchscreen Interaction (2022) · cites this paper as [34]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 46 · Cited by 86
- Authors
- Pongrac, H.
- Affiliations
- Universität der Bundeswehr München (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Pongrac, Helena
- Venue
- Multimedia Systems
- Published
- 2007-10-19
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 297-307
- ISSN
- 0942-4962 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1882
- OpenAlex
- W2016551353
- Cited by
- 86
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 0.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Multimedia Systems (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Teleoperation and Haptic Systems
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Keywords
- vibrotactile perception, just noticeable difference, frequency discrimination, amplitude, acceleration, tactile display, teleoperation, haptic feedback, visual dominance, high-frequency vibration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
