Cited by 137Cardiac and Coronary Surgery TechniquesHemodynamic Monitoring and TherapyMechanical Circulatory Support Devices

Vasoactive-inotropic score as a predictor of morbidity and mortality in adults after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass

Yamazaki, Yumiko, Oba, Koji, Matsui, Yoshiro, Morimoto, Yuji·2018·Journal of Anesthesia

Abstract

Purpose The vasoactive-inotropic score (VIS) is a scale showing the amount of vasoactive and inotropic support. Recently, it was suggested that the VIS after cardiac surgery predicts morbidity and mortality in infants. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the VIS at the end of surgery as a predictor of morbidity and mortality in adult cardiac surgery.Methods A retrospective cohort study of 129 adult cardiac surgery patients was performed at a university hospital. The primary outcome was termed "poor outcome", which was a composite of morbidity and mortality. The secondary outcomes were the duration of intensive care unit (ICU) stay and time to first extubation. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between the VIS and poor outcomes. A proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the duration of the ICU stay and time to first extubation.Results After adjusting for the EuroSCORE, preoperative ejection fraction, and bypass time, a high VIS at the end of surgery was associated with a poor outcome with an adjusted odds ratio of 4.87 (95% confidence interval 1.51-18.94; p = 0.007). After controlling for the EuroSCORE and bypass time, patients with a high VIS experienced longer ICU stay (hazard ratio 1.62; 95% confidence interval 1.10-2.39; p = 0.015) and needed longer ventilation (hazard ration 1.87; 95% confidence interval 1.28-2.74, p = 0.001).Conclusions The amount of cardiovascular support at the end of cardiac surgery may predict morbidity and mortality in adults.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00540-018-2447-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There were four different ways in which inotropes were used in definitions: duration of inotrope administration; specific inotropic drug used; Vasoactive-Inotropic Score (VIS); and number of used inotropes.

    “There were four different ways in which inotropes were used in definitions, namely: (1) the duration of inotrope administration; (2) the specific inotropic drug used (epinephrine, norepinephrine, dopamine, dobutamine and milrinone); (3) the Vasoactive-Inotropic Score (VIS), a formula that quantifies the amount of cardiovascular support (25, 26); and (4) the number of used inotropes (Table 1).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 137

Authors
Yamazaki, Y., Oba, K., Matsui, Y., & Morimoto, Y.
Affiliations
  • Hokkaido University (JP)
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
Corresponding author
Yamazaki, Yumiko
Venue
Journal of Anesthesia
Published
2018-01-13
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
167-173
ISSN
  • 0913-8668 (ISSN-L)
  • 1438-8359
OpenAlex
W2782904951
Cited by
137
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7
FWCI
12.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Anesthesia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Keywords
vasoactive-inotropic score, cardiac surgery, cardiopulmonary bypass, postoperative morbidity, postoperative mortality, ICU length of stay, extubation time, mechanical ventilation, cardiovascular support, risk prediction, EuroSCORE
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Cardiopulmonary Bypass, Female, Heart Defects, Congenital, Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Length of Stay, Male, Middle Aged, Morbidity, Postoperative Period, Retrospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Airway Extubation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review