Cited by 56Anesthesia and Sedative AgentsHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlCancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response

Differential effects of remimazolam and propofol on heart rate variability during anesthesia induction

Hasegawa, Gen, Hirata, Naoyuki, Yoshikawa, Yusuke, Yamakage, Michiaki·2022·Journal of Anesthesia

Abstract

Purpose The effects of remimazolam on autonomic nervous activity have not been elucidated. We investigated the differential effects of remimazolam and propofol on autonomic nervous activity during anesthesia induction. Methods Thirty patients were randomly divided into a remimazolam group or a propofol group for anesthesia induction. Hemodynamics and indices of heart rate variability were recorded before and after anesthesia. Low frequency power (LF; 0.04-0.15 Hz, ms 2 ) and high frequency power (HF; 0.15-0.4 Hz, ms 2 ) were calculated from power spectral density of heart rate variability. LF reflects both sympathetic and parasympathetic activities and HF reflects parasympathetic activity. To investigate the balance between sympathetic and parasympathetic activities, the normalized unit (%) of LF (LF nu) and that of HF (HF nu) were calculated. Changes in LF nu (ΔLF nu) before and after anesthesia (ΔLF nu = LF nu at awake-LF nu after anesthesia) were compared between the groups. Results Remimazolam and propofol decreased blood pressure and power spectral density of heart rate variability. Remimazolam did not change LF nu and HF nu, while propofol increased LF nu and decreased HF nu (P = 0.020). ΔLF nu in the remimazolam group (1.4 ± 23.6%) were less than that in the propofol group (19.3 ± 22.4%, P = 0.0415). Conclusion Remimazolam and propofol decreased autonomic nervous activity during anesthesia induction. Remimazolam preserved the balance of sympathetic and parasympathetic…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00540-022-03037-8

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hasegawa, G., Hirata, N., Yoshikawa, Y., & Yamakage, M.
Affiliations
Sapporo Medical University (JP)
Corresponding author
Hirata, Naoyuki
Venue
Journal of Anesthesia
Published
2022-01-13
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
239-245
ISSN
  • 0913-8668 (ISSN-L)
  • 1438-8359
OpenAlex
W4206727546
Cited by
56
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 2
FWCI
14.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Anesthesia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
Keywords
remimazolam, propofol, anesthesia induction, heart rate variability, autonomic nervous system activity, sympathetic activity, parasympathetic activity, sympathovagal balance, blood pressure, hemodynamics
MeSH terms
Anesthesia, General, Benzodiazepines, Electrocardiography, Heart Rate, Humans, Propofol

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review