Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi associated with vegetation and soil parameters under rest grazing management in a desert steppe ecosystem
Abstract
The impact of rest grazing on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and the interactions of AMF with vegetation and soil parameters under rest grazing condition were investigated between spring and late summer in a desert steppe ecosystem with different grazing managements (rest grazing with different lengths of resting period, banned or continuous grazing) in Inner Mongolia, China. AMF diversity and colonization, vegetation biomass, soil properties and soil phosphatase activity were examined. In rest grazing areas of 60 days, AMF spore number and diversity index at a 0-10 cm soil depth as well as vesicular and hyphal colonization rates were higher compared with other grazing treatments. In addition, soil organic matter and total N contents were highest and soil alkaline phosphatase was most active under 60-day rest grazing. In August and September, these areas also had the highest amount of aboveground vegetation. The results indicated that resting grazing for an appropriate period of time in spring has a positive effect on AMF sporulation, colonization and diversity, and that under rest grazing conditions, AMF parameters are positively correlated with some soil characteristics.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is some evidence that belowground microbial activity can be enhanced under rotational grazing.
“There is also some evidence that belowground microbial activity can be enhanced under rotational grazing [24]”
From Impacts of Rotational Grazing on Soil Carbon in Native Grass-Based Pastures in Southern Australia (2015) · cites this paper as [24]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Impacts of Rotational Grazing on Soil Carbon in Native Grass-Based Pastures in Southern Australia
Sanderman, J., Reseigh, J., Wurst, M., Young, M.-A., & Austin, J. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0136157 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bai, G., Bao, Y., Du, G., & Qi, Y.
- Affiliations
- Inner Mongolia University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Bao, Yuying
- ORCID
- Bao, Yuying
- Venue
- Mycorrhiza
- Published
- 2012-11-22
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 289-301
- ISSN
- 0940-6360 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1890
- OpenAlex
- W2169120615
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 2.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Mycorrhiza (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- Inner Mongolia University
- Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia
- Inner Mongolia Agricultural University
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant and fungal interactions
- Keywords
- arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, rest grazing, grazing management, desert steppe, AMF diversity, AMF spore abundance, soil organic matter, soil phosphatase activity, plant biomass, grazing ban, Inner Mongolia
- MeSH terms
- Carbon, China, Desert Climate, Fungi, Poaceae, Nitrogen, Seasons, Soil, Soil Microbiology, Ecosystem, Mycorrhizae
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review