The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pedicle screw insertion accuracy with different assisted methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Computer-assisted Orthopedic Surgery
Sugano, N. (2003) · Journal of Orthopaedic Science · doi:10.1007/s10776-002-0623-6 · Cited by 184
Cited by
Accuracy of augmented reality-assisted pedicle screw placement: A systematic review
Youssef, S., McDonnell, J. M., Wilson, K. V., Turley, L., Cunniffe, G., Morris, S., Darwish, S., & Butler, J. S. (2024) · European Spine Journal · doi:10.1007/s00586-023-08094-5 · Cited by 36
“…to the novel application for AR-assisted pedicle screw placement in the cervical region, and mitigate concerns due to the close proximity of vertebral arteries to cervical pedicles, with similar accuracy rates to novel intraoperative navigation systems employed for similar purposes [35, 36].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Tian, N.-F., Huang, Q.-S., Zhou, P., Zhou, Y., Wu, R.-K., Lou, Y., & Xu, H.-Z.
- Venue
- European Spine Journal
- Published
- 2010-09-23
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 846-859
- ISSN
- 0940-6719 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0932
- OpenAlex
- W2074739320
- Cited by
- 345
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
